ARTICLE
4 February 2020

SDE Issues Revised Guidance On Initial Evaluation Timelines: Federal Timeline No Longer Applicable Beginning 2020-2021

SG
Shipman & Goodwin LLP

Contributor

Shipman & Goodwin’s value lies in our commitment -- to our clients, to the profession and to the community. We have one goal: to help our clients achieve their goals. How we accomplish it is simple: we devote our considerable experience and depth of knowledge to understand each client’s unique needs, business and industry, and then we develop solutions to meet those needs. Clients turn to us when they need a trusted advisor. With our invaluable awareness of each client’s challenges, we can counsel them at every step -- to keep their operations running smoothly, help them navigate complex business transactions, position them for future growth, or resolve business disputes. The success of our clients is of primary importance to us and our attorneys invest meaningful time getting to know the client's business and are skilled in the practice areas and industry sectors critical to that success. With more than 175 attorneys in offices throughout Connecticut, New York and in Washington, DC, we serve the needs of
On January 23, 2020, the Connecticut State Department of Education ("SDE") issued updated guidance on the timeline for initial special education evaluations (available here).
United States Consumer Protection
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On January 23, 2020, the Connecticut State Department of Education (“SDE”) issued updated guidance on the timeline for initial special education evaluations (available here). This new guidance replaces SDE’s December 21, 2018 guidance on that same topic, which is now rescinded.  In its new guidance, SDE notifies stakeholders that Connecticut will no longer use the federal 60 calendar day timeline for initial evaluations, effective with the start of the 2020-2021 school year.  Rather, Connecticut school districts must adhere solely to the 45 school day timeline as provided in state special education regulations.  Previously, school districts were deemed in compliance by SDE if they used either the state or federal timeline.

The state’s 45 school day timeline, codified at Conn. Agencies Regs. § 10-76d-13, requires that a school district must implement an individualized education program (“IEP”), for a student who is found eligible for special education and related services, within 45 school days of the student’s referral to a planning and placement team (“PPT”), excluding the time required to obtain parental consent for the evaluation.  

The new SDE guidance clarifies that this 45-day timeline for implementation of the IEP pauses for up to 10 school days each (1) between the time the parents are provided the initial evaluation consent form and the time the parent provides written consent for the evaluation, and (2) between the time the parents are provided the consent for the provision of special education services and the time the parent provides written consent.  

The SDE guidance also provides various scenarios to explain the timelines.

  1. When a school district receives a referral for special education during the school year, it must implement the student’s IEP within 45 school days of a referral (excluding the time it takes to obtain written parental consent to conduct the initial evaluation or to begin providing special education).  The guidance also notes that under Connecticut’s regulation, the timeline for implementation of an IEP must occur within 60 school days of the PPT referral in cases where a student’s IEP requires an out-of-district or private placement (excluding the time it takes to obtain written parental consent).
     
  2. When a school district receives a referral for special education at the end of the school year, SDE “strongly encourage[s] districts to complete the initial evaluation as soon as possible.”  Nevertheless, the guidance acknowledges that a “district may complete the evaluation at the beginning of the next school year provided that it adheres to the State’s 45 school day timeline.  Notably, the guidance states that “the lack of staff or student availability during the summer months may prevent the evaluation from being completed sooner.” 
     
  3. When a district receives a referral for special education between school years, the date of the referral may be deemed to be the first school day of the next school year.  In such cases, the district would have 45 school days from the first school day of the next school year to meet the 45 school day timeline.
     
  4. When a district receives notice from the Connecticut Office of Early Childhood about a child enrolled in Birth to Three who either resides in district or has a “nexus” with the district, the district should consider such notice as an official referral and should start the referral process immediately.  The guidance notes that written parental consent for an initial evaluation is still required even if the PPT uses available evaluations from the Birth to Three system to determine the student’s eligibility for special education and related services.  In addition, the guidance reminds districts that an eligible student must have an IEP in place by the student’s third birthday. 

The guidance further clarifies that the state 45 school day timeline begins after the district receives a completed and signed PPT referral form or a written referral.  SDE suggests that, if a parent/guardian informs a staff member verbally that the parent/guardian believes the child may have a disability or need special education services, the staff member should direct the parent/guardian to put his/her concerns in writing (or provide accommodations for a parent/guardians who cannot put their concerns in writing), and the district must accept that writing as a PPT referral.

Special education administrators and staff responsible for conducting or overseeing the completion of initial evaluations are encouraged to read this new guidance, which also contains important information about reporting requirements and a helpful flowchart.  While the guidance generally summarizes existing legal requirements, it may be a helpful resource for quick reference or to help explain the initial evaluation timelines and process to parents/guardians.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More