ARTICLE
3 September 2020

Money Transfer Companies Settle CFPB Charges For Remittance Transfer Violations

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
Two money transfer companies settled CFPB charges for failing to comply with error resolution and disclosure requirements under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act ("EFTA") and Subpart B to Regulation E.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Two money transfer companies settled CFPB charges for failing to comply with error resolution and disclosure requirements under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act ("EFTA") and Subpart B to Regulation E (a/k/a the "Remittance Transfer Rule").

In a Consent Order, the CFPB stated that a money transfer company failed to accept valid requests for (i) the cancellation of a transfer via telephone and (ii) the refund of a transfer. The CFPB found that the company did not provide customers with (i) proper disclosures of the delivery dates and associated fees or (ii) a statement outlining the rights of a sender, in violation of the Remittance Transfer Rule. The CFPB determined that the company misled its customers regarding the timeline for submitting error notices and misrepresented the services it offered. To settle the charges, the company agreed to (i) pay a $1.6 million penalty and (ii) adopt an adequate compliance plan, should it continue offering remittance transfers.

In a separate Consent Order, the CFPB stated that a second remittance transfer company failed to refund fees to senders who asked to resend their transactions. The CFPB found that the company did not provide customers involved in error investigations with written explanations of the company's findings. Additionally, the CFPB stated that the company's prepayment disclosures were inadequate. To settle the charges, the company agreed to (i) a $300,000 penalty and (ii) $100,000 in consumer redress. The company also agreed to implement written policies to ensure compliance with the Remittance Transfer Rule.

The CFPB stated that these settlements are reflective of a "sweep" of enforcement actions that address Remittance Transfer Rule violations.

Commentary Rachel Rodman

The CFPB's enforcement office has been very active of late, rolling out consent orders with mortgage originators, a large bank regarding overdraft sales practices, and now remittance providers. These two settlements put remittance providers and money transmitters on notice that the CFPB will enforce the technical requirements of EFTA and Regulation E.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More