ARTICLE
10 January 2017

PIPE Transactions

MF
Morrison & Foerster LLP

Contributor

Known for providing cutting-edge legal advice on matters that are redefining industries, Morrison & Foerster has 17 offices located in the United States, Asia, and Europe. Our clients include Fortune 100 companies, leading tech and life sciences companies, and some of the largest financial institutions. We also represent investment funds and startups.
In a year of significant volatility, it is not surprising that there was increased reliance on PIPE (private investment in public equity) transactions.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In a year of significant volatility, it is not surprising that there was increased reliance on PIPE (private investment in public equity) transactions. Traditionally, PIPE transactions have provided a useful capital-raising alternative when the public markets are inhospitable. During this past year, energy companies relied on PIPE transactions in order to recapitalize their companies and many of these transactions resulted in change of control. We summarize the PIPE activity for 2016 in our infographic.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More