FTC And DOJ Jointly Issue Draft Merger Guidelines

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
Proposing a radically different conception of government enforcement merger guidelines, the Federal Trade Commission ...
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Proposing a radically different conception of government enforcement merger guidelines, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") and the Department of Justice ("DOJ"), on July 19, 2023, jointly issued draft merger guidelines ("Draft Guidelines") that would replace current Merger Guidelines, which were revised last in 2010. Stating that the "goal of this update is to better reflect how the agencies determine a merger's effect on competition in the modern economy," the structure of the Draft Guidelines replaces the step-by-step economically analytical approach to merger analysis with a manifesto of 13 doctrinaire statements that will instead guide the Agencies' analysis. See FTC/DOJ Press Release dated July 19, 2023.

The Draft Guidelines will apply to all mergers, horizontal and vertical, but specifically call out mergers of tech platforms and PE roll-up strategies and include other novel and throw-back merger enforcement concepts.

  • The Draft Guidelines retain the use of the Hirfindahl-Hirschman Index ("HHI") to measure market concentration, but replace the higher 2010 HHI thresholds with those that hark back to the first guidelines of 1982. Other than a bald assertion that more "permissive" higher HHI brackets led to more concentrated and less competitive markets, the Draft Guidelines provide no economic basis for reverting to lower HHI thresholds to trigger a transaction challenge.
  • According to an FTC/DOJ Fact Sheet issued with the Draft Guidelines, "[n]otably, these are the first merger guidelines to cite case precedents ... to ensure it is rooted in the law." However, the reference to precedents is far from comprehensive. For example, Guideline 6 on vertical mergers fails to cite the Agencies' recent court defeats in the United Healthcare/Change Healthcare and Microsoft/Activision cases. The reliance on legal principles that are not generally supported by case law is likely to lead to expensive litigation for proposed buyers of businesses, and possibly further Government litigation losses. See Fact Sheet – 2023 Draft Merger Guidelines for Public Comment.
  • Without specifically naming the private equity industry, which the agencies have targeted in numerous speeches in the past several years, the Draft Guidelines clearly take aim at the PE practice of portfolio company "roll-ups." "A firm that engages in an anticompetitive pattern or strategy of multiple small acquisitions in the same or related business lines may violate Section 7, even if no single acquisition on its own would risk substantially lessening competition or tending to create a monopoly." See Draft Guidelines at 22 and Guideline 9. The Draft Guidelines also reflect for the first time the agencies' intentions to investigate the controversial question of whether and how an investor's "partial ownership or minority interests" in competitors may influence competition. See Guideline 12.
  • The Fact Sheet states, "[p]latform markets present distinct competitive considerations from the traditional market structures of the 20th century economy, as they often preset high entry barriers and are likely to tip in ways that entrench dominant firms." See Fact Sheet.
  • In an expected departure from past antitrust merger enforcement, the Draft Guidelines "build on th[e] principle [of consumer harm] and explain that the agencies will evaluate the impact of a merger on labor as a stand-alone basis to challenge a transaction." Id.

The "thirteen guidelines" that the Agencies propose to govern a transaction's competitive analysis are as follows:

Guideline 1: Mergers Should Not Significantly Increase Concentration in Highly Concentrated Markets.

Guideline 2: Mergers Should Not Eliminate Substantial Competition between Firms.

Guideline 3: Mergers Should Not Increase the Risk of Coordination.

Guideline 4: Mergers Should Not Eliminate a Potential Entrant in a Concentrated Market.

Guideline 5: Mergers Should Not Substantially Lessen Competition by Creating a Firm That controls Products or Services That Its Rivals May Use to Compete.

Guideline 6: Vertical Mergers Should Not create Market Structures That Foreclose Competition.

Guideline 7: Mergers Should Not Entrench or Extend a Dominant Position.

Guideline 8: Mergers Should Not Further a Trend Toward Concentration.

Guideline 9: When a Merger is Part of a Series of Multiple Acquisitions, the Agencies May Examine the Whole Series.

Guideline 10: When a merger Involves a Multi-Sided Platform, the Agencies Examine Competition Between Platforms, on a Platform, or to Displace a Platform.

Guideline 11: When a Merger Involves Competing Buyers, the Agencies Examine Whether It May Substantially lessen Competition for Workers or other Sellers.

Guideline 12: When an Acquisition Involves Partial Ownership or Minority Interests, the Agencies Examine Its Impact on Competition.

Guideline 13: Mergers Should Not Otherwise Substantially Lessen Competition or Tend to Create a Monopoly.

The Draft Guidelines will be open for public comments until September 18, 2023 (60 days). Thereafter, the Agencies will evaluate whether to make changes to the Draft Guidelines before finalizing them.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More