ARTICLE
5 August 2019

Gigi Hadid Copyright Lawsuit Dismissed For Failure To Timely Register

BF
Berman Fink Van Horn P.C.
Contributor
Berman Fink Van Horn is a full-service business law firm. Our entrepreneurial lawyers help clients run their business. We help start and grow a business - and avoid and resolve business issues along the way. With an exceptional reputation for highly responsive and personal service, finding creative business solutions is a cornerstone of the firm.
A copyright lawsuit filed by a paparazzi agency against model Gigi Hadid was recently dismissed because the paparazzi agency failed to complete its registration
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

A copyright lawsuit filed by a paparazzi agency against model Gigi Hadid was recently dismissed because the paparazzi agency failed to complete its registration of its copyright before commencing the lawsuit. The paparazzi agency sued Ms. Hadid for copyright infringement after she posted a photo of her taken by the agency to her Instagram, where Ms. Hadid has over 48 million followers.

Registration is required before filing a copyright infringement action

This is perhaps the most high-profile example of the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision inFourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com, LLC, where the Supreme Court definitively held that actual registration of a copyright is a prerequisite to a copyright action, resolving a long-running split in the U.S. Circuit Courts. In dismissing the lawsuit against Ms. Hadid, the New York District Court held that the Supreme Court's decision foreclosed the paparazzi agency's copyright infringement claim against Ms. Hadid. Though the agency had filed its application for registration of its copyright, it had not received actual registration of its copyright by the time it filed the lawsuit.

Copyright lawsuit raises interesting questions

The copyright lawsuit against Ms. Hadid raised several interesting questions regarding copyright and photos. Ms. Hadid argued that her posting of the photo was fair use because she merely reposted the photo to her Instagram and made no effort to commercially exploit it. She also argued she had an implied license to the photo because she contributed to it by posing and smiling for the photo, choosing her outfit, and cropping the picture before posting it. Thus, she argued, the photo embodied simultaneously created original expressions by both participants: the photographer taking the picture and Ms. Hadid posing for the photograph.

These issues were not resolved in this case as it was dismissed on procedural grounds. Nevertheless, in a world where photographs can be taken on cellular phones by virtually anyone at any time, and the overwhelming popularity and use of social media, these issues are sure to come to a head in the future.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
5 August 2019

Gigi Hadid Copyright Lawsuit Dismissed For Failure To Timely Register

United States Intellectual Property
Contributor
Berman Fink Van Horn is a full-service business law firm. Our entrepreneurial lawyers help clients run their business. We help start and grow a business - and avoid and resolve business issues along the way. With an exceptional reputation for highly responsive and personal service, finding creative business solutions is a cornerstone of the firm.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More