Digital Technology Does Not Follow First Sale Of Tangible Equivalents

WE
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Contributor
More than 800 attorneys strong, Wilson Elser serves clients of all sizes across multiple industries. It maintains 38 domestic offices, another in London and enjoys more extensive international reach as a founding member of Legalign Global.  The firm is currently ranked 56th in the National Law Journal’s NLJ 500.
Adam R. Bialek and Michael Barer weighed in on the Second Circuit's affirmation of a Southern District of New York finding that a digital music resale platform infringed on the copyrights of an American record...
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Adam R. Bialek (Partner-New York) and Michael Barer (Associate-New York) weighed in on the Second Circuit's affirmation of a Southern District of New York finding that a digital music resale platform infringed on the copyrights of an American record label regarding the music files being resold. Adam and Michael suggest that the Second Circuit's decision "has reinforced a literal application of copyright as written rather than reconcile the intent of the first sale doctrine with modern technology." Clarification of this issue will require an action by Congress or the Supreme Court, they say. "In the interim, physical copies of such recordings will continue to be legally transferrable while digital versions will not." 

Read the Article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Digital Technology Does Not Follow First Sale Of Tangible Equivalents

United States Intellectual Property
Contributor
More than 800 attorneys strong, Wilson Elser serves clients of all sizes across multiple industries. It maintains 38 domestic offices, another in London and enjoys more extensive international reach as a founding member of Legalign Global.  The firm is currently ranked 56th in the National Law Journal’s NLJ 500.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More