ARTICLE
6 February 2017

Supreme Court's Unanimous Decision Places Increased Housing Obligations On Municipalities

AG
Archer & Greiner P.C.
Contributor
Archer & Greiner is now Archer. But what matters most is what remains the same. Our new name still represents an unwavering commitment to delivering large-firm expertise with small-firm attention—no matter the size of the client. It’s a philosophy that’s helped us grow into one of the largest and most trusted law firms in the Mid-Atlantic region, serving businesses and individuals throughout the region and in a growing number of other states and jurisdictions. With a network of regional offices from Delaware to New York, Archer has more than 175 lawyers practicing in all major legal disciplines including corporate, labor, commercial litigation, family, real estate and many more.
On January 18, 2017, the New Jersey Supreme Court released a unanimous decision, ruling that the State's municipalities have an obligation to provide affordable housing for residents for the period from 1999-2015.
United States Government, Public Sector
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On January 18, 2017, the New Jersey Supreme Court released a unanimous decision, ruling that the State's municipalities have an obligation to provide affordable housing for residents for the period from 1999-2015.  The Court's decision in this "gap year" appeal marked the end of more than 12 years of litigation, which began in 2004 when the State Council on Affordable Housing (COAH), adopted new rules to govern the affordable housing obligations of municipalities. Those rules, governing Mount Laurel's Third Round, were challenged repeatedly and ultimately struck down, creating a gap between the last enforceable rules in effect in 1999 and the present. Municipalities claimed they had no obligation to provide for affordable housing during the pending litigation; developers and housing advocates rejected this analysis as wrong.

In deciding against the municipalities, the Supreme Court found that affordable housing obligations that arose during the "gap" years of 1999-2015 could not simply be ignored, as the municipalities suggested.  The Supreme Court found that such an argument was inconsistent with past practices of COAH and inconsistent with the municipalities' past voluntary participation in the same.

The Supreme Court directed that new housing need numbers be calculated for these intervening years; and characterized these calculations as "present need" within the meaning of the statute. In practice, the decision will likely result in an increase in the municipalities' housing obligations, with municipalities obligated to adopt new plans to provide for this housing, including by rezoning properties not presently approved for residential use.

This decision marks the end of a very long legal process and will impact virtually every community in the State.  Anticipating this decision, many municipalities already have reached settlements in court, so their new numbers are already known.  If we can assist you in evaluating the development potential for a site in any community, we would be happy to do so.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
6 February 2017

Supreme Court's Unanimous Decision Places Increased Housing Obligations On Municipalities

United States Government, Public Sector
Contributor
Archer & Greiner is now Archer. But what matters most is what remains the same. Our new name still represents an unwavering commitment to delivering large-firm expertise with small-firm attention—no matter the size of the client. It’s a philosophy that’s helped us grow into one of the largest and most trusted law firms in the Mid-Atlantic region, serving businesses and individuals throughout the region and in a growing number of other states and jurisdictions. With a network of regional offices from Delaware to New York, Archer has more than 175 lawyers practicing in all major legal disciplines including corporate, labor, commercial litigation, family, real estate and many more.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More