ARTICLE
2 December 2019

Swap Dealer Penalized For Technology Malfunctions

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
A swap dealer settled CFTC charges for failing to provide certain audio recordings during an investigation.
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

A swap dealer settled CFTC charges for failing to provide certain audio recordings during an investigation.

According to the CFTC, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLP was required as a swap dealer to maintain audio recordings of activity on the phone lines for trading and sales desks but failed to do so for twenty calendar days due to a technical malfunction. The CFTC found that as a result of the reported malfunction, Goldman Sachs was unable to fulfill the agency's request to provide certain recordings and, ultimately, "impeded" an ongoing investigation.

To settle the charges, Goldman Sachs agreed to (i) cease and desist from further violating CFTC regulations, (ii) pay a $1,000,000 civil monetary penalty and (iii) comply with the conditions and undertakings outlined in the Offer.

Commentary Bob Zwirb

According to the Order, the problem here was caused by a malfunction that occurred during a system upgrade involving the installation of a "Microsoft security patch" on software that Goldman uses, which, in turn, caused the recording hardware to malfunction - which in turn, was exacerbated by the failure of the hardware's "failsafe alarm" system to alert Goldman of the failure. The Order goes on to state that "[a]t the time Goldman had followed the vendor's configuration instructions and was unaware of the vulnerability of the recording hardware it utilized."

The matter illustrates the very high cost - in terms of monetary sanctions - that a financial firm can incur from any technological glitch, here involving the installation of a software security patch, which presumably was meant to protect the firm from cybersecurity threats that under CFTC policy can subject the firm to sanctions if allowed to fester. So you try to fix one problem and you unintentionally cause another: no rest for the weary (in the IT department), as the saying goes. But the policy issue here is whether the harm to the public, or the deterrent value, resulting from an unfortunate and presumably good-faith error, justifies a million-dollar penalty.

Sometimes, stuff happens.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More