ARTICLE
14 December 2020

FDIC And FRB Update Resolution Plan Submission Guidance For Certain Foreign Banks

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
The FDIC and the Federal Reserve Board (collectively, the "Agencies") finalized previously proposed guidance regarding the submission of the resolution plans with respect to certain large foreign banking organizations .
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The FDIC and the Federal Reserve Board (collectively, the "Agencies") finalized previously proposed guidance regarding the submission of the resolution plans with respect to certain large foreign banking organizations ("FBOs").

As previously covered, the proposed guidance was largely consistent with the 2018 FBO guidance and 2019 Domestic Covered Company guidance. The finalized guidance substantially reflects the proposal. However, the Agencies made several modifications to the proposed guidance in response to comments they received, including:

  • updating the scope of the guidance to include FBOs that are Category II firms under the tailoring rule (see tailoring rule (see previous coverage);
  • eliminating certain capital, liquidity and governance mechanisms, payment, clearing and settlement, and derivatives and trading activities expectations;
  • removing from the scope, among other areas, guidance on group resolution plans, and the management information systems, qualified financial contracts and mapping of branch activities;
  • eliminating, among other things, home/host coordination and supervisory information sharing expectations; and
  • clarifying that all previous guidance not included in the consolidated guidance has been superseded.

The agencies noted that the final guidance is not intended to limit a firm's assessment of additional vulnerabilities or obstacles unique to its particular structure, operations or resolution strategy.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More