Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court added to its docket a climate change case filed by the City of Baltimore against major oil and gas companies seeking to recover the cost of local climate impacts including flooding and heat waves. Baltimore's claims, filed in state court under state common law, mirror allegations against the oil and gas industry in lawsuits from state and local governments in California, Colorado, Rhode Island and elsewhere. Defendants in the case are seeking to remove the cases from state court to federal court where they believe the court will be less willing to entertain expansive theories of liability. A ruling against Baltimore would give the oil and gas industry another chance to steer the city's case toward federal court, and it would reopen jurisdictional questions in climate cases from local governments in California and Colorado.
Originally published by Smith Gambrell, October 2020
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.