ARTICLE
13 March 2014

Proposed Changes To The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure

JD
Jones Day

Contributor

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs.
On August 15, 2013, the Judicial Conference's Advisory Committee on Civil Rules proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On August 15, 2013, the Judicial Conference's Advisory Committee on Civil Rules ("Advisory Committee") proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("FRCP"). The amendments included changes to several of the Rules, with the most significant changes to Rules 26 and 37. These changes, which the Advisory Committee first explored at a May 2010 conference at the Duke University School of Law, are arguably the most significant modifications to discovery since the 1993 amendments requiring initial disclosures. From May 2010 to April 2013, the Advisory Committee developed the proposed changes, which are designed to reach the goal of the FRCP—"[securing] the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding." The amendments realize this goal by expediting the initial stages of each matter, ensuring that discovery is proportional and limited to the claims and defenses at issue in the litigation, and providing that parties are not subjected to unnecessary costs related to an overly broad scope of discovery or document preservation obligations.

The amendments were open to public comment from August 15, 2013 to February 18, 2014. The more than 2,300 comments submitted run the gamut from enthusiastically welcoming the changes as essential to sharply criticizing them as unnecessary and unfair. Commenters on both sides suggested further changes. Several bodies must now consider the rules and these related comments. This White Paper describes the proposed changes, provides an overview of the comments submitted, and outlines the next steps in the process.

Read the full White Paper.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
13 March 2014

Proposed Changes To The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure

United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Contributor

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More