ARTICLE
14 February 2017

CFPB Fines Lender And Real Estate Brokers For Improper Kickback Scheme

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
On Jan. 31, 2017, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) filed consent orders against one of the largest independent residential mortgage lenders, two real estate brokers...
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On Jan. 31, 2017, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) filed consent orders against one of the largest independent residential mortgage lenders, two real estate brokers and a mortgage servicer for their roles in an improper "kickback" scheme involving mortgage referrals. The fines here were notable given that the CFPB targeted realtors for accepting payments from the referral arrangements.

Prospect Mortgage, a mortgage lender based in Sherman Oaks, California, was assessed a $3.5 million civil penalty for paying illegal kickbacks. ReMax Gold Coast, based in California, and Keller Williams Mid-Willamette, headquartered in Oregon, are two of the real estate brokers with which Prospect Mortgage had improper marketing service arrangements. The CFPB also took action against a Connecticut-based mortgage servicer for accepting fees from Prospect Mortgage for referring consumers seeking to refinance.

CFPB Director Richard Cordray said in a release, "We will hold both sides of these improper arrangements accountable for breaking the law, which skews the real estate market to the disadvantage of consumers and honest businesses."

To prevent exploitation of consumers, Section 8 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) prohibits making payments or providing kickbacks to anyone, including brokers and agents, in return for referring consumers to particular real estate settlement service providers. This includes mortgage lenders, title insurers and home inspectors. The CFPB determined that each entity violated RESPA § 8 by making or accepting payments for mortgage referrals.

Notably, ReMax Gold Coast will pay $50,000 in civil money penalties and Keller Williams Mid-Willamette will pay $145,000 in disgorgement and $35,000 in penalties.

ReMax Gold Coast and Keller Williams Mid-Willamette

The CFPB determined that ReMax Gold Coast and Keller Williams Mid-Willamette accepted improper referral payments through marketing services agreements (MSAs), lead agreements and desk-license agreements with Prospect Mortgage.

For instance, pursuant to a lead agreement with Prospect Mortgage, Keller Williams Mid-Willamette increased payment amounts to agents who steered a greater number of consumers to Prospect Mortgage in a given month. Keller Williams Mid-Willamette paid $20 per lead when the agent provided one or two leads in a month, $30 per lead for three to five leads, $40 for five to nine leads and $50 per lead for 10 or more leads. The CFPB's investigation revealed that several agents earned $500 or more in certain months under this arrangement.

Prospect Mortgage

The CFPB found that Prospect Mortgage executed an MSA with each company, which served to disguise referral payments as payments for advertising or promotional services. Specifically, Prospect Mortgage engaged in several improper payment arrangements:

  • Mortgage referrals: Prospect Mortgage maintained agreements with more than 100 real estate brokers, including ReMax Gold Coast and Keller Williams Mid-Willamette, to deliver mortgage referral payments. Prospect Mortgage tracked each broker's number of referrals and adjusted MSA payment amounts accordingly.
  • Prequalification: Brokers and agents required consumers seeking to purchase a property to prequalify with Prospect Mortgage as part of a purchase agreement, even those who had prequalified with another lender. For example, depending on the home price, Prospect Mortgage paid between $10 and $25 each time it received a prequalification from ReMax Gold Coast – a so-called "write in" tactic used to drive improper referrals.
  • Fee splitting: Prospect Mortgage also engaged in illegal fee splitting with a Connecticut-based mortgage servicer that referred consumers looking to refinance to Prospect Mortgage. Prospect Mortgage compensated the servicer for the referrals by evenly splitting the proceeds of the sale of such loans.

The CFPB has not deemed MSAs to be illegal on their face, but has signaled its distaste for the practice by continuing to expose and discontinue kickbacks. This is the first public censure of a realty firm for accepting fees for mortgage referrals.

We will continue to monitor mortgage referral developments affecting the financial services industry.

The consent order filed against ReMax Gold Coast is available at: http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/201701_cfpb_RGCServices-consent-order.pdf

The consent order filed against Keller Williams Mid-Willamette is available at: http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/201701_cfpb_Willamette-Legacy-consent-order.pdf

The consent order filed against Prospect Mortgage is available at: http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/201701_cfpb_ProspectMortgage-consent-order.pdf

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More