ARTICLE
3 November 2023

There's No Antitrust In Baseball. But Why Not?

M
MoginRubin
Contributor
MoginRubin is a leading antitrust and competition law firm prepared to meet today’s demanding challenges in litigation, strategic counseling, and policy advocacy. Our legal and economic expertise, built by litigating some of the nation’s landmark cases, means our clients get the clarity, focus, and commitment they need when faced with legal issues.
Two minor league baseball teams have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to make a call on the common-law "baseball exemption" to antitrust enforcement, which they call a judicially-created "aberration"...
United States Antitrust/Competition Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Two minor league baseball teams have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to make a call on the common-law "baseball exemption" to antitrust enforcement, which they call a judicially-created "aberration" and possibly the Court's "longest-lived mistake." The Second Circuit rejected their challenge to a decision by Major League Baseball to shrink the farm league system. Minor league clubs maintain MLB colluded to break off their affiliations, driving many of them out of business.

Owners of the Tri-City ValleyCats and The Norwich Sea Unicorns seek to overturn their case and precedent going back more than 100 years. In 1922, the Supreme Court held that "'exhibitions' of 'base ball' d[o] not implicate the Sherman Act because they d[o] not involve interstate trade or commerce." (Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore, Inc. v. National League of Professional Baseball Clubs, 259 U.S. 200, 1922). The clubs drew some inspiration for their petition from Justice Brett Kavanaugh who wrote in a concurring opinion in 2021's NCAA v. Alston case that such immunity "would be flatly illegal in almost any other industry in America."

Major League Baseball teams, the minor league teams argue, "[A]re free to conspire to raise prices, inflate their earnings with monopoly rents, or (as they did here) enter into a horizontal agreement to reduce output and boycott other businesses. There is no democratic consensus for this immunity: Congress never enacted a law exempting professional baseball from the Sherman Act. Nor, as the United States observed in this case, is there any policy rationale supporting the exemption."

The teams call this case an "ideal vehicle" to revisit the baseball exemption. Without it, they say they would have been able to challenge MLB's "naked horizontal agreement to restrain competition."

"Having destroyed forty businesses in one fell swoop, MLB will only be further emboldened if the Court denies review here," the petition reads.

It was filed on Sept. 18. MLB has until Oct. 23 to respond, but has asked that the deadline be moved to Nov. 22.

This summer, a group of staunchly conservative Republican senators — Sens. Mike Lee (R-UT), Marco Rubio (R-FL), Ted Cruz (R-TX), and Josh Hawley (R-MO) — introduced a bill to end MLB's antitrust immunity. In March 2022, the staunchly liberal Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) announced a similar measure.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
3 November 2023

There's No Antitrust In Baseball. But Why Not?

United States Antitrust/Competition Law
Contributor
MoginRubin is a leading antitrust and competition law firm prepared to meet today’s demanding challenges in litigation, strategic counseling, and policy advocacy. Our legal and economic expertise, built by litigating some of the nation’s landmark cases, means our clients get the clarity, focus, and commitment they need when faced with legal issues.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More