ARTICLE
23 April 2019

Ferrara Candy Company Settles Artificial Flavor Class Action

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
San Diego resident Jessica Littlejohn seems to be a committed fan of SweeTARTS candy.
United States Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Settlement is uncommon in its simplicity, lack of monetary award

Love Gone Sour

San Diego resident Jessica Littlejohn seems to be a committed fan of SweeTARTS candy. So are we – they've remained a dependably tasty American Halloween staple for more than five decades.

Over the years, Littlejohn has purchased several varieties of the product, including the original chalky tablets, the giant chewy sub-brand and the chewy sours variety.

So, what made this fangirl turn sour on SweeTARTS manufacturer Ferrara Candy?

Malic Aforethought?

We've covered Ferrara's packaging tribulations before, although this time around it isn't a slack-fill case. In this instance, Littlejohn accused the company in an April 2018 class action of failing to disclose its use of malic acid as a flavoring ingredient in the SweeTARTS line.

Malic acid comes in a few varieties, including a naturally occurring version and synthetic strains that have passed muster for human consumption. Littlejohn claims that Ferrara uses a synthetic version of the flavoring called "DL-malic" acid to flavor the treats, giving the lie to the "no artificial flavors" tag on the packaging.

The specific accusations in question? Littlejohn says Ferrara failed to note the use of malic acid on either the front or back side of the package, as required by law; called DL-malic by a generic term in its ingredients list rather than by its specific name; and failed to state that the characteristic flavor of the product ("fruit") was bolstered with the use of an artificial flavoring that contributed to the tart taste.

The Takeaway

Littlejohn tackled Ferrara with a number of charges, including fraud by omission, negligent misrepresentation, breach of express and implied warranties, and violations of California's Consumers Legal Remedies Act, Unfair Competition Law and False Advertising Law.

The parties began settlement negotiations in October of last year, and the Southern District of California granted preliminary approval at the end of February. The settlement is distinctive; the only agreement between the parties is that Ferrara promises to remove the "No Artificial Flavors" tag from the product line packaging by the end of this year, and to identify "DL-malic acid" as an ingredient by the same deadline.

But aside from attorney's fees and other expenses, there's no cash for the class; SweeTARTS aficionados will have to be satisfied that their class representatives sued Ferrara simply to make the world a better place.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More