No Grand Départ-Ure From The Board Of Appeal's Decision For Société Du Tour De France

MC
Marks & Clerk

Contributor

Marks & Clerk is one of the UK’s foremost firms of Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys. Our attorneys and solicitors are wired directly into the UK’s leading business and innovation economies. Alongside this we have offices in 9 international locations covering the EU, Canada and Asia, meaning we offer clients the best possible service locally, nationally and internationally.
As cycling fans across the globe eagerly await the Grand Départ of the 111th Tour de France on Saturday 29 June (myself included!), the Tour owners have been grinding their own uphill...
European Union Transport
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

As cycling fans across the globe eagerly await the Grand Départ of the 111th Tour de France on Saturday 29 June (myself included!), the Tour owners have been grinding their own uphill battle in EU opposition proceedings.

The General Court recently handed down its Judgment in opposition proceedings that the Société du Tour de France filed against German gym chain FitX's application for the figurative mark TOUR DE X.

The opposition was filed back in 2017 on the grounds that Société du Tour de France felt there would be a likelihood of confusion between the marks (which covered inter alia 'sporting activities' in Class 41) and that the mark would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctive character or repute of the earlier marks. The EU IPO had previously rejected the opposition in its entirety in April 2019, a decision that was then upheld by the Board of Appeal (BoA).

The Société du Tour de France appealed the BoA's Decision to the General Court; however, in its Judgment handed down on 12 June, the Court dismissed the appeal. The Court firstly held that, even though the services were identical, the public would not be confused given the low degree of similarity between the marks, particularly due to the low level of distinctiveness of the common element 'tour de'. It further held that, as the element 'tour de' was common in the context of cycling competitions, it would not connect the two marks, even despite the reputation of the Tour de France.

The Decision is a fresh reminder that marks are unlikely to be found similar where the common element has weak distinctive character.

The only common element between the marks – 'tour de' – has a weak distinctive character and the degree of similarity between the marks is low.

curia.europa.eu/...

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More