Successful Defence Of Clinical Negligence Shoulder Claim

CC
Clyde & Co

Contributor

Clyde & Co  logo
Clyde & Co is a leading, sector-focused global law firm with 415 partners, 2200 legal professionals and 3800 staff in over 50 offices and associated offices on six continents. The firm specialises in the sectors that move, build and power our connected world and the insurance that underpins it, namely: transport, infrastructure, energy, trade & commodities and insurance. With a strong focus on developed and emerging markets, the firm is one of the fastest growing law firms in the world with ambitious plans for further growth.
Following instructions from NHS Resolution, Clyde & Co have successfully defended a claim involving an alleged negligently performed shoulder operation.
UK Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Following instructions from NHS Resolution, Clyde & Co have successfully defended a claim involving an alleged negligently performed shoulder operation.

The Claimant, who was seeking more than £300,000 in damages, alleged that the surgeon had caused him to suffer a brachial plexus nerve injury by using excessive force during the course of a routine operation to treat his frozen shoulder.

NHS Resolution instructed Clyde & Co to investigate the Claimant's allegations and we obtained independent expert evidence indicating that the Claimant's injuries had probably not been caused by the surgery, but were more likely to have been related to the Claimant's pre-existing health problems, including diabetes and degenerative spinal conditions.

In accordance with NHS Resolution strategy, attempts were made to resolve the claim without recourse to Court proceedings. A round table meeting was held, at which offers were made to the Claimant in view of some litigation risk and in an effort to avoid the considerable costs that would be associated with a fully contested trial. However, the Claimant chose to reject those offers and NHS Resolution therefore instructed us to robustly defend the case at trial.

Following a 5 day trial earlier this year, the Judge ruled in favour of the NHS Trust, finding that there was no evidence that the surgeon had done anything wrong during the course of the procedure, and no evidence that the Claimant had actually sustained a brachial plexus injury. Ultimately, the Judge concluded that "unless it is proved that a brachial plexus injury has been sustained, the case in negligence does not get off the ground".

As a result of the Judgment in this case, NHS Resolution will now be able to recoup its legal costs from the Claimant's insurers.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More