ARTICLE
14 April 2015

Inquiry Means Closer Scrutiny For Big Retailers

CC
Clyde & Co

Contributor

Clyde & Co  logo
Clyde & Co is a leading, sector-focused global law firm with 415 partners, 2200 legal professionals and 3800 staff in over 50 offices and associated offices on six continents. The firm specialises in the sectors that move, build and power our connected world and the insurance that underpins it, namely: transport, infrastructure, energy, trade & commodities and insurance. With a strong focus on developed and emerging markets, the firm is one of the fastest growing law firms in the world with ambitious plans for further growth.
The first formal investigation by the grocery industry watchdog has been launched following allegations by the Groceries Code Adjudicator that supermarket giant Tesco may have breached the Grocery Supply Code of Practice.
UK Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The first formal investigation by the grocery industry watchdog has been launched following allegations by the Groceries Code Adjudicator that supermarket giant Tesco may have breached the Grocery Supply Code of Practice.

The Code is designed to regulate the relationship between supermarkets and their suppliers but since its introduction in 2009 has, in reality, had limited impact. However, that could be about to change with this investigation.

The investigation will focus on supposed delays to payments made to suppliers and also payments allegedly made by suppliers to secure better shelf positioning. The inquiry will focus on Tesco only at this stage.

At present, the adjudicator's powers are limited to naming and shaming retailers and to recommending improved practices for the future. However, the Government has recently published plans to give the adjudicator the power to fine retailers up to 1% of their annual UK turnover.

This of course will be of concern to all the big retailers, not only in terms of the potential levels of penalty but particularly the adverse publicity. Indeed, given the changing retail landscape and the growing competitive threat from the discounters, the immediate adverse reputational harm of being caught in the adjudicator's spotlight may be more of a deterrent than the risk of a fine.

The inquiry is likely to take around six months unless it is broadened, in which case it could take about nine months. We will continue to monitor and a further update will follow in due course.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More