ARTICLE
5 February 2021

Employee Injunctions: Recent Cases On Protecting Confidential Information

For many employers, confidential information, customer connections and a pool of skilled employees are fundamental to the success of their business.
UK Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

For many employers, confidential information, customer connections and a pool of skilled employees are fundamental to the success of their business. In a post-Covid world, where employers need to capitalise on every asset and protect against avoidable threats more than ever before, this is a particularly 'hot topic.  Applications for injunctions to protect confidential information are increasingly hitting the courts – a trend that is expected to continue.

Rebecca Jackson highlights some recent employee injunction cases and offers practical advice for employers.

Injunctions against [former] employees

During or following termination of their employment, employees or former employees often have the ability to take advantage of confidential information, strategic plans, customer/client details or other important information relating to their employer's business – often to benefit a rival business.  It is therefore common for employers to include, in the contract of employment, various express contractual terms with a view to preventing employees from disclosing confidential information, competing, soliciting clients and poaching employees. Such provisions are often referred to as restrictive covenants or post-termination clauses.

In our In our   our recent webinar on restrictive covenants and employer injunctions.

Footnotes

1 [2020] 11 WLUK 254

2 presumably this clause was intended to capture new ventures/start-ups, as well as existing competitors.  This is likely to be increasingly relevant in light of the UK Government's stated intentions to boost innovation and entrepreneurialism to support post-Covid economic recovery.  See our  recent article for more information and for proposals for reform in relation to non-compete covenants.

3 that is, an undertaking to compensate the defendant if it is ultimately decided that the injunction should not have been awarded

American Cyanamid Co (No 1) v Ethicon Ltd [1975] UKHL 1

5 [2020] 12 WLUK 192

6 Apart from providing advice on merits and strategy, the involvement of a legal specialist should ensure that the employer's overall position remains protected, and in particular that legal privilege applies, from the outset.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More