ARTICLE
16 February 2018

Thai Authority's Rejection Of Abuse Of Dominance Complaint Upheld

BM
Baker & McKenzie

Contributor

Baker & McKenzie
Thailand's Supreme Administrative Court has upheld a decision by the Office of Trade and Competition Commission (OTCC) to reject a complaint by several Thai health advocacy organizations ...
Thailand Antitrust/Competition Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Thailand's Supreme Administrative Court has upheld a decision by the Office of Trade and Competition Commission (OTCC) to reject a complaint by several Thai health advocacy organizations that an international pharmaceutical company had abused a dominant position, in breach of the Trade Competition Act 1999.

The complaint concerned the company's decision to withdraw its drug registration in 2007 after the Thai government had announced the compulsory licensing (CL) of its HIV medication. The OTCC had rejected the complaint, on the grounds that:

  • the company's turnover fell below the current statutory turnover threshold of THB 1 billion (approximately USD 31 million), one of the criteria that needs to be fulfilled for a finding of dominance
  • in any event, the withdrawal of the registration would not have constituted an abuse, as it did not prevent customers from accessing the product from outside Thailand

It should be noted that new criteria for defining dominance in Thailand are due to be announced by 5 October 2018, so businesses should monitor any changes to ensure compliance. Watch this space for further details in due course.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
16 February 2018

Thai Authority's Rejection Of Abuse Of Dominance Complaint Upheld

Thailand Antitrust/Competition Law

Contributor

Baker & McKenzie
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More