Russia's Primary Social Network In Hot Water Again Over Failure To Police Infringement

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
Russia's Facebook, vKontakte, is under fire for its allegedly poor handling of pervasive copyright infringement on its platform (literally translated from Russian, "v kontakte" means "in contact").
Russian Federation Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Russia's Facebook, vKontakte, is under fire for its allegedly poor handling of pervasive copyright infringement on its platform (literally translated from Russian, "v kontakte" means "in contact"). The Association for the Protection of Copyright on the Internet, or AZAPO, has sued vKontakte in Moscow City Court on behalf of author Zahar Prilepin for his book "Resident." AZAPO claims that vKontakte has refused to respond to several takedown requests of unlicensed digital copies of "Resident." AZAPO is seeking an injunction that would force ISPs to block vKontake's 80 million daily users' access to its social network.

vKontakte was previously sued by major music publishers Universal and Warner, as well as by two Russian record companies, in the Arbitration Court of St. Petersburg. The Arbitration Court ruled that vKontakte was not meeting its obligation to combat piracy on its network. Though the Arbitration Court ruled that no damages were due to Warner and Universal, it did award damages to the Russian record companies. When asked why AZAPO did not seek redress through the Arbitration Court, and instead chose Moscow City Court, AZAPO's director general responded that procedures in the Arbitration Court are too long and expensive, and copyright owners need a more swift method of resolving infringement. vKontakte, on the other hand, views this move as "pressuring" the company rather than engaging in a constructive conversation, which arbitration would provide. Russia's reaction to enforcement of copyrights continues to evolve, and many will be watching to see if the AZAPO case alters the landscape for online revenues for books.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More