Read first, Tick second: The importance of understanding contract terms and conditions

CL
Cavell Leitch

Contributor

It’s our mission to deliver New Zealand’s best legal experience. This isn’t just about our expertise but about the way we deliver it. We understand that legal matters can be confusing, stressful and scary so we try our hardest to simplify the process, listen to your needs and deliver timely, transparent advice.
This case demonstrates the huge consequences that can arise when contract terms and conditions aren't read.
New Zealand Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

A recent decision from the Supreme Court of New South Wales is a timely warning for consumers and businesses of the importance in reading terms and conditions before they are signed.

Michael Hill Jeweller (Australia) Pty Ltd (Michael Hill) has been ordered to pay AUD $2,259,971.40 (plus interest and costs) to its packaging supplier Gispac Pty Ltd (Gispac), for breaching the supplier's terms and conditions.

In 2014, Michael Hill signed three new sale agreements with Gispac as part of an international rebrand. The sale agreements included a tick box that read "please tick to confirm you agree the terms and conditions that can be found at the following link...".

Without reading the terms and conditions, Michael Hill physically signed the agreements and ticked the box. They had unknowingly agreed to be liable for any shortfall between the specified minimum order quantity and the actual number of bags ordered. They had also agreed to pay for any products ordered but not purchased, and that Gispac would be the exclusive supplier.

Gispac first issued a shortfall notice in 2017 for AUD $2.1M. Michael Hill disputed this and Gispac pursued Michael Hill for breach of contract. As part of their defence, Michael Hill claimed that the link to the terms and conditions was not working at the time the sale agreements were entered into. However, the court found no evidence of that. The terms and conditions were held to be valid and Michael Hill were bound by them.

Ticking a box is a small act, but this case demonstrates the huge consequences that can arise when the terms and conditions aren't read. It is a none too subtle reminder that before entering into any contract, businesses and consumers should ensure that they fully understand the terms and conditions, including any terms that are incorporated into the agreement by reference.

This case also demonstrates the importance for businesses of having robust terms and conditions that apply to their provision of goods and services.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More