ARTICLE
11 April 2019

NJ Acts On #MeToo, But Broadens To All Discrimination And Harassment

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
In response to #MeToo, New Jersey legislators introduced a bill that would preclude non-disclosure agreements in settlement agreements, but New Jersey took the ban even further than most states
Jersey Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In response to #MeToo, New Jersey legislators introduced a bill that would preclude non-disclosure agreements in settlement agreements, but New Jersey took the ban even further than most states and applied the ban to claims of discrimination, harassment or retaliation of any kind. Governor Murphy signed a revised version of this bill on March 18, and it is now law, effective immediately, that non-disclosure agreements that attempt to limit the details related to any claims of discrimination, harassment or retaliation are always unenforceable against the current or former employee, and will become unenforceable against the employer if the current or former employee publicly discloses sufficient details of the claim such that the employer is reasonably identifiable. It is unclear as of yet if "details related to a claim of discrimination, retaliation, or harassment" includes the settlement retaliation, or harassment" includes the settlement terms related thereto, or only the underlying details of the actual harassment, discrimination or retaliation, but based on the broad language of the law, it seems likely that it was intended to encompass both the underlying facts and the settlement agreement details. The law also requires settlement agreements regarding discrimination, harassment and retaliation to contain particular language informing the employee about this law. The law also imposes a non-retaliation provision, a private right of action, and an attorneys' fees award against anyone who attempts to enforce these unenforceable non-disclosure provisions.

Separately, the law prohibits employment agreements from containing any waiver of substantive or procedural rights or remedies relating to any claims of discrimination, retaliation or harassment. Although it is unclear if this prohibition against waiver was intended to include the right to a jury trial for discrimination, harassment and retaliation claims, it is likely that plaintiffs' attorneys will interpret the law in that manner and attempt to use it to avoid arbitration agreements. However, like many state bans on arbitration that we have seen post #MeToo, it is very likely that, if challenged, the FAA would supersede it.

New Jersey employers should review all settlement agreement templates they may be using and be sure to update them.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More