ARTICLE
3 January 2024

ESMA Provides Update On Fund ESG Naming Rules

KG
K&L Gates

Contributor

At K&L Gates, we foster an inclusive and collaborative environment across our fully integrated global platform that enables us to diligently combine the knowledge and expertise of our lawyers and policy professionals to create teams that provide exceptional client solutions. With offices spanning across five continents, we represent leading global corporations in every major industry, capital markets participants, and ambitious middle-market and emerging growth companies. Our lawyers also serve public sector entities, educational institutions, philanthropic organizations, and individuals. We are leaders in legal issues related to industries critical to the economies of both the developed and developing worlds—including technology, manufacturing, financial services, health care, energy, and more.
On 14 December, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) issued a Public Statement updating its proposals for guidelines on funds' names using ESG or sustainability-related terms...
European Union Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On 14 December, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) issued a Public Statement updating its proposals for guidelines on funds' names using ESG or sustainability-related terms, following its consultation on the same guidelines (ESMA34-472-373, the Guidelines) that ran from November 2022 to February 2023.

Key Changes to the Guidelines Since the Consultation

Thresholds for Sustainable Investments

ESMA has decided against applying the threshold of 50% in sustainable investments for the use of sustainability-related words in funds' names and instead proposes that such terms be used only where funds (a) use at least 80% of investments to attain environmental or social characteristics or objectives; (b) apply the Paris-Aligned Benchmark (PAB) exclusions (such exclusions being, e.g., certain activities related to tobacco and certain controversial weapons and fossil fuels); and (c) invest meaningfully in "sustainable investments" (as defined in Article 17 (2) of the SFDR).

Transition-Related Terms

ESMA proposes that funds that use "transition"-related terms should, in addition to the 80% threshold, apply Climate Transition Benchmark exclusions (as set out in Articles 12(1)(a)-(c), and 12(2) of Regulation (EU) 2020/1818).

Separation of "Environmental" From "Social" and "Governance" Terms

Funds with social or governance terms, and no environmental terms, in their names need not apply PAB exclusions as their investment universe may otherwise be unduly restricted by the fossil fuel exclusions.

Measurability of Impact and Transition Terms

Funds using "transition" or "impact"-related terms in their names should also ensure that a proportion of investments generate positive, measurable social or environmental impact or are on a clear and measurable path to transition.

Next Steps

It is expected the Guidelines will be published in 2024 (following the ongoing AIFMD and UCITS review) and, while compliance will be immediately expected for new funds, existing funds will have a 6 month implementation period.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More