ARTICLE
14 September 2018

Oppression And Mismanagement - The Indian Scenario

SR
S.S. Rana & Co. Advocates

Contributor

S.S. Rana & Co. is a Full-Service Law Firm with an emphasis on IPR, having its corporate office in New Delhi and branch offices in Mumbai, Bangalore, Chennai, Chandigarh, and Kolkata. The Firm is dedicated to its vision of proactively assisting its Fortune 500 clients worldwide as well as grassroot innovators, with highest quality legal services.
Difficulty arises when the interests of shareholders vary.
India Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Although, a company has an existence independent from its members, its affairs are carried on by its management. Difficulty arises when the interests of shareholders vary. However, the management of companies depends upon the majority.

Although, a shareholder cannot bring action relating to the internal disputes between the shareholders as per the Foss v Harbottle Rule, there arise certain exceptions to this provision. This includes the cases of oppression and mismanagement in the affairs of the company.

Oppressive Acts

The following acts constitute oppression:

  • Company's conduct is against the principles of fair dealing
  • Imposition of new and risky objects which are being opposed by the other faction of the shareholders
  • Depriving a member of his membership
  • Exercise of undue/harsh burden on a member
  • Acts of the company are against the provisions of the law

Acts of Mismanagement

The following acts constitute mismanagement:

  • Differences between the directors
  • Serving of the office by the director after the expiration of the term
  • Neglect/ breach of duty by the director
  • Improper appointment of the director
  • Group in power intends to defraud

Remedy at law

The Companies Act, 2013 under Section 241 provides the right to any member of the company to apply to Tribunal for relief in case of: -

(i) Oppression - where the affairs of the company are being conducted in a manner prejudicial to the public interest or oppressive to member or prejudicial to the company's interests. [Section 241 (1A)];

(ii) Mismanagement - if it is established that the affairs of the company are being conducted in a manner prejudicial to the company or public interests or by reason of change of the control of the company [Section 241 (1B)]

Powers of the Tribunal

Under the provisions of Section 242 (2), the Tribunal may allow relief to the complaining shareholders in case of oppression or mismanagement, some of which include:

  • Regulation of the company's future affairs;
  • Direction to purchase the company's shares by other members;
  • Restriction on transfer of allotment;
  • Termination, setting aside, modification of any agreement between the company and its management;
  • Termination, setting aside, modification of any agreement between the company and any third person;
  • Setting aside of any transaction of transfer, delivery, payment, execution, etc.;
  • Removal of any member of the management;
  • Recovery of undue gains made by the management;
  • Appointment of the members of the management;
  • Imposition of costs.

The Indian legal system safeguards the interests of the shareholders who may suffer the impact of any oppression or mismanagement by providing recourse to appropriate remedy.

For further information please contact at S.S Rana & Co. email: info@ssrana.in or call at (+91- 11 4012 3000). Our website can be accessed at www.ssrana.in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More