CCI Proposes To Amend Combination Regulations

HA
HSA Advocates
Contributor
A modern law firm with 28 partners and 120+ professionals, HSA leverages its deep regulatory underpinnings and sectoral knowledge to provide practical, implementable and enforceable advice. With its full-service capabilities and four offices pan-India, the firm is well known for its proactive approach to composite risk redressal and seamless cross-jurisdiction support while advising clients on their multi-faceted requirements.
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) issued a press release proposing to omit Para 5.7 from Form I, which provides for giving information regarding non-compete restrictions (Restrictions)...
India Antitrust/Competition Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) issued a press release1 proposing to omit Para 5.7 from Form I, which provides for giving information regarding non-compete restrictions (Restrictions) under the Combination Regulations2. If the proposal is effectuated, it may assist CCI in adhering to the timelines for deciding applications seeking its approval for combinations.

Parties entering into a combination may not henceforth be required to furnish information on noncompete restrictions for the purpose of its examination by the CCI. They won't also be required to justify such non-compete restrictions, if the CCI's current thinking is anything to go by.

CCI is of the view that prescribing a general set of standards for assessment of non-compete restrictions may not be appropriate in modern business environments. While it may be possible to conduct a detailed examination on case by case basis, the same may, however, not be feasible considering the timelines followed in combination cases as per the release.

It maybe recalled that the CCI had already issued a Guidance Note explaining the circumstances under which a non-compete restriction would be regarded as ‘ancillary' or ‘not ancillary'. The Guidance Note provides that three years of non-compete obligation is usually justified in case of transfer of goodwill and know-how and two years in case of transfer of goodwill alone. It further provides that the scope of non-compete shall be restricted to the business sold and the territory where it was conducted. However, a finding that the restriction is not ancillary does not raise any presumption of infringement under the provisions of the Act.

Footnotes

1 Press Release No. 10/2020-21, dated May 15, 2020, CCI https://www.cci.gov.in/sites/default/files/whats_newdocument/PublicComments-Non-Compete.pdf

2 Competition Commission of India (Procedure in regard to the transaction of business relating to combinations) Regulations, 2011

Originally published 29 June, 2020

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

CCI Proposes To Amend Combination Regulations

India Antitrust/Competition Law
Contributor
A modern law firm with 28 partners and 120+ professionals, HSA leverages its deep regulatory underpinnings and sectoral knowledge to provide practical, implementable and enforceable advice. With its full-service capabilities and four offices pan-India, the firm is well known for its proactive approach to composite risk redressal and seamless cross-jurisdiction support while advising clients on their multi-faceted requirements.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More