ARTICLE
23 September 2015

EU Court Suspends EMA Decision To Grant Access To Drug Data

JD
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs.
The EMA issued a decision granting Novartis access to the requested reports on the basis that such documents did not contain "commercial confidential information."
European Union Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On September 1, 2015, the European General Court granted an interim order in favor of Pari Pharma, temporarily suspending the operation of a decision by the European Medicines Agency ("EMA") to allow Novartis Europharm to gain access to reports on Pari Pharma's drug Vantobra under the agency's new transparency regulation. Such reports were prepared for and supported Vantobra's marketing authorizing application.

Novartis was originally granted "orphan" designation for its cystic fibrosis treatment TOBI Podhaler. However, Pari was able to obtain market clearance for its rival product, in part by proving its treatment was clinically superior due to greater safety in a substantial portion of the target population. Novartis subsequently made a request under Regulation 1049/2001 ("Transparency Regulation") for access to the Similarity Report and Superiority Report between the two products. The EMA issued a decision granting Novartis access to the requested reports on the basis that such documents did not contain "commercial confidential information."

Pari appealed the EMA decision on the basis that it violates the Transparency Regulation and thus violates the applicant's fundamental rights and freedoms with respect to private life and confidentiality under article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union ("Charter") and article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights, among other things. Pari argues that disclosure would allow any competitor to simply use the data for the purpose of obtaining marketing authorization for its own tobramycin product without any additional investment, thereby undermining Pari's commercial interest, and that there is no overriding public interest in disclosure of the documents. The court's order temporarily suspends the EMA's decision, while the main case is pending. This case is the latest in a series of cases brought by pharmaceutical companies challenging the EMA's policy on access to documents.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
23 September 2015

EU Court Suspends EMA Decision To Grant Access To Drug Data

European Union Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Contributor
Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More