ARTICLE
17 November 2017

Puerto Rico Secretary Of Labor Issues Opinion Regarding Allowed Payroll Deductions Following Hurricanes Irma And María

LM
Littler Mendelson

Contributor

With more than 1,800 labor and employment attorneys in offices around the world, Littler provides workplace solutions that are local, everywhere. Our diverse team and proprietary technology foster a culture that celebrates original thinking, delivering groundbreaking innovation that prepares employers for what’s happening today, and what’s likely to happen tomorrow
On November 10, 2017, Puerto Rico's Secretary of the Department of Labor and Human Resources ("Secretary") issued Opinion No. 2017-002 ("Opinion") ...
Puerto Rico Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On November 10, 2017, Puerto Rico's Secretary of the Department of Labor and Human Resources ("Secretary") issued Opinion No. 2017-002 ("Opinion") addressing allowable deductions from non-exempt employees' pay following hurricanes Irma and María. Many employers have been helping their employees by advancing them funds for emergency needs and have sought advice as to whether payroll deductions allowing employees to slowly repay such advances is a viable option. According to the new Opinion, the answer is most likely "no."

The Opinion clarifies that payroll deductions for non-exempt employees are limited to those listed in Act No. 17 of April, 17, 1931, as amended ("Act 17"). Act 17 regulates the payment of wages, prohibits employers from imposing limits on the way employees spend their wages, and establishes a detailed list of the permissible wage deductions in Puerto Rico. The Secretary emphasized in his Opinion that he cannot add exceptions not listed in Act 17 to the prohibition of deductions from wages, even in emergency situations. As a result, when an employer purchases goods or services—such as a generator—for a non-exempt employee, it cannot recoup the cost through deductions from that employee's wages. This practice is prohibited even if the non-exempt employee has authorized it in writing. Any agreement between an employer and a non-exempt employee that allows a payroll deduction for the reimbursement of goods or services acquired by the employer would violate Act 17. Violations of any of the provisions of Act 17 constitute a misdemeanor which, albeit seldom imposed, may result in imprisonment of up to six months, a fine not exceeding $5,000, or house arrest or community service of up to six months.

Notably, the provisions of Act 17 do not apply to exempt employees. Therefore, it is permissible for exempt employees to voluntarily consent to payroll deductions, as long as the agreement does not violate any other statute and is not against public policy or order. Any deductions from payroll for the reimbursement of goods or services acquired by the employer will be governed by what is strictly agreed upon between the parties.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More