Applealing Briefs - Episode 2: Commission Scolaire Francophone Des Territoires Du Nord-Ouest (Podcast)

MT
McCarthy Tétrault LLP

Contributor

McCarthy Tétrault LLP provides a broad range of legal services, advising on large and complex assignments for Canadian and international interests. The firm has substantial presence in Canada’s major commercial centres and in New York City, US and London, UK.
Must a regulator consider the Charter even when making a decision that does not engage a Charter right? In Commission scolaire francophone, the Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that the answer is "yes."
Canada Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Must a regulator consider the Charter even when making a decision that does not engage a Charter right? In Commission scolaire francophone, the Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that the answer is "yes." In doing so, the Court reignited a long-running discussion about Charter rights and "Chartervalues" in administrative law. In this episode of Appealing Briefs,host Adam Goldenberg speaks with Caroline Zayid, McCarthy Tétrault's Regional Managing Partner for Ontario and a leading administrative lawyer, about what regulators and regulated entities should take from this decision and how they should make sense of the Charter's role in administrative decision making and judicial review. (13:47 minutes)

To view the original article click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More