In a case that has been anticipated as one of the top 5 corporate law decisions to watch for 2015 the Supreme Court of Canada held this morning that leave of the court to commence an action for secondary market misrepresentation under the Ontario Securities Act must be obtained within the prescribed three-year limitation period, and that the limitation period for obtaining leave is not tolled in circumstances where a class proceeding has been commenced. However, the court has the jurisdiction to grant "backdated" leave – an order nunc pro tunc – where the plaintiff is granted leave after the expiry of the limitation period but filed the leave motion prior to the expiry of the limitation period. The decision by a heavily divided Court came in a trilogy of cases – Green v. CIBC, Silver v. IMAX, and Celestica v. Millwright Regional Council of Ontario Pension Trust Fund – reported as CIBC v. Green ("CIBC").
For more information on this decision –
download here.
Further information on the background and context of these cases is
available here.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.