Court Upholds Minister's Refusal To List ELANCO Patent Due To Filing Date

SB
Smart & Biggar

Contributor

Smart & Biggar uncovers and maximizes intellectual property and technology assets for our clients. Today’s fast-paced innovation economy demands a higher level of expertise and attention to detail when it comes to IP strategy and protection. With over 125 lawyers, patent agents and trademark agents collaborating across five Canadian offices, Smart & Biggar is trusted by the world’s leading innovators to find value in their IP rights. As market leaders in IP, Smart & Biggar’s team is on the pulse when it comes to the latest developments and the wider industry changes that impact our clients. To stay informed, visit smartbiggar.ca/insights, including access to our RxIP Update (smartbiggar.ca/insights/rx-ip-updates), a monthly digest of the latest decisions and law surrounding the life sciences and pharmaceutical industries.
The Federal Court has dismissed Elanco's application for judicial review of the Minister of Health's refusal to list Canadian Patent No. 2,812,704 on the Patent Register ...
Canada Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Federal Court has dismissed Elanco’s application for judicial review of the Minister of Health’s refusal to list Canadian Patent No. 2,812,704 on the Patent Register in respect of IMPRESTOR (pegbovigrastim): Elanco v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 5. The Minister assigned a filing date for Elanco’s New Drug Submission (NDS) as the date the Veterinary Drugs Directorate determined the submission to be administratively complete, rather than the date on which all substantive components of the submission were provided for evaluation. All substantive components had not initially been submitted as Health Canada had agreed that Elanco could participate in a phased submission process, aligned with the timeline for submission of data to the United States Food and Drug Administration to enable simultaneous reviews. The Judge found that the Minister’s determination of the filing date was reasonable. Since Elanco filed its patent application after the NDS filing date, the patent did not meet the timing requirements for listing eligibility under subsection 4(6) of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (PMNOC Regulations). Elanco did not appeal.

The preceding is intended as a timely update on Canadian intellectual property and technology law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. To obtain such advice, please communicate with our offices directly.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More