ARTICLE
24 April 2017

Importance Of Good Faith Participation In OBSI Processes Stressed In JRC's 2016 Annual Report

SE
Stikeman Elliott LLP

Contributor

Stikeman Elliott LLP logo
Stikeman Elliott is a global leader in Canadian business law and the first call for businesses working in and with Canada. We provide clients with the highest quality counsel, strategic advice, and creative solutions. Stikeman Elliott consistently ranks as a top law firm in our primary practice areas. www.stikeman.com
On March 23, 2017, the JRC of the OBSI released its 2016 Annual Report which summarizes the JRC's activities in 2016, including, as is periodically required by its agreement with the CSA, an independent evaluation of OBSI's operations and practices for its investment mandate.
Canada Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On March 23, 2017, the Joint Regulators Committee (JRC) of the Ombudsman for Banking Services and Investments (OBSI) released its 2016 Annual Report (the Report) which summarizes the JRC's activities in 2016, including, as is periodically required by its agreement with the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA), an independent evaluation of OBSI's operations and practices for its investment mandate.

The evaluator (a former New Zealand Banking Ombudsman) recommended a number of enhancements to OBSI's mandate, including the ability to make binding awards and a public policy function under which it would prepare submissions on regulatory and legislative proposals and advise regulators on the effectiveness of existing regulations. The evaluator also recommended raising OBSI's compensation cap and increasing clarity around the negotiated settlement process by, for example, including a rationale for settlement amounts in settlement letters and by publishing a short guide to the process for firms and consumers.

The JRC consists of representatives of the CSA, the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada (MFDA). It meets periodically with OBSI to review matters related to the OBSI dispute resolution services that registered dealers and advisers are required to make available to their clients in accordance with National Instrument 31-103, (except in Quebec, where the AMF provides similar services).

Related documents that may be of interest to our readers include OBSI's response to the independent evaluation and its Strategic Plan for 2017-2021. For further information, please see CSA Staff Notice 31-348 OBSI Joint Regulators Committee Annual Report for 2016 (March 23, 2017).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More