ARTICLE
2 January 2019

Ontario Court Of Appeal Denies Leave To Appeal: Environmental No-Fault Order Compelling Off-Site Investigation Stands

WS
Willms & Shier Environmental Lawyers LLP

Contributor

Willms & Shier Environmental Lawyers LLP logo
Willms & Shier Environmental Lawyers LLP www.willmsshier.com is Canada’s recognized leading environmental law firm, delivering a full range of environmental, Indigenous and energy law services. For 40 years, our clients have benefitted from our innovative, practical solutions and extensive knowledge of environmental, Indigenous, and energy and natural resource issues.  With 19 highly specialized lawyers, we are the largest private sector environmental law practice in Canada.  Seven of our lawyers are Environmental Law Specialists, certified by the Law Society of Ontario. Willms & Shier has offices in Toronto, Ottawa, Calgary and Yellowknife.  Our lawyers are called to the Bar in Alberta, British Columbia, New Brunswick, Nunavut, the Northwest Territories, and Ontario.
Last week, the Ontario Court of Appeal denied leave to appeal from the Divisional Court's decision in Hamilton Beach Brands Canada, Inc. v Ministry of the Environment.
Canada Environment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Last week, the Ontario Court of Appeal denied leave to appeal from the Divisional Court's decision in Hamilton Beach Brands Canada, Inc. v Ministry of the Environment.1

We previously reported that the Divisional Court upheld the Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks ("MECP") Director's jurisdiction to issue Orders requiring off-site environmental investigation.

The upshot of Hamilton Beach is that Ontario Environmental Protection Act, s. 18 no-fault Orders requiring off-site environmental investigation are permitted even where the Orderee did not have any association with the polluting activity aside from the Orderee's current or former ownership and/or occupation of the contaminated source property.

Footnotes

1 14 CELR (4th) 137 (Ont ERT) aff'd 2018 ONSC 5010 (Div Ct); Decision issued September 4, 2018. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More