ARTICLE
21 November 2019

CSA Provides Guidance On Public M&A Transaction Disclosure

CW
Clark Wilson LLP

Contributor

Clark Wilson is a multifaceted law firm based in Vancouver, BC with a strong track record of being highly integrated into our clients’ businesses. Known for our industry insight, entrepreneurial culture and strategic networks, we actively seek to connect our clients with the people, resources and solutions they need to succeed.
On November 12, 2019, the Canadian Securities Administrators ("CSA") provided guidance on disclosure for reporting issuers doing merger and acquisition
Canada Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On November 12, 2019, the Canadian Securities Administrators ("CSA") provided guidance on disclosure for reporting issuers doing merger and acquisition ("M&A") transactions in the cannabis and other emerging growth industries.

The CSA has found that many emerging growth issuers and their directors and officers have participated in the financings of other similar issuers. This participation has resulted in a higher than usual cross-ownership of financial interests amongst cannabis and other issuers and their directors and officers. These financial interests may include overlapping debt and equity interests, or other business relationships. The CSA states that the cross-ownership of financial interests results in conflicts of interest that may lead investors to re-examine other variables such as purchase price, transaction timing or contingent payments. These variables may not otherwise be considered in the same manner if the conflict of interest is not disclosed. Non-disclosure of the cross-ownership of financial interests may also cause investors to question whether the M&A transaction occurred on its own merits.

The CSA considers that regardless of the form of disclosure document used, issuers must disclose the cross-ownership of financial interests as material to the transaction. The CSA also states that personal or business relationships with other directors and officers of the issuer must be considered in the determination of a director's independence. Directors must not have a direct or indirect 'material relationship' with the issuer in order to be independent.

The M&A Disclosure guidance can be found here. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More