The Competition Bureau recently confirmed that it has issued a No Action Letter in the proposed acquisition of Canexus Corporation by Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund.
Both Canexus and Chemtrade produce chemicals for the pulp and paper industry.
This is the second time that the Bureau has found that a transaction's anti-competitive effects would be offset by the efficiencies gained from the transaction, including savings related to transportation costs.
The first time the Competition Act's efficiencies exception was used was when the Bureau issued a No Action Letter in relation to Superior Plus Corp.'s proposed acquisition of Canexus. That deal was abandoned by Superior Plus when the U.S. Federal Trade Commission challenged the acquisition.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.