ARTICLE
8 November 2015

Judicial Restructuring Does Not Proscribe Collection Against Guarantors Or Co-Obligors

LS
Levy & Salomao Advogados

Contributor

Levy & Salomao Advogados
Brazil's Superior Court of Justice (STJ) Forth Panel recently upheld that the approval of a financial restructuring plan does not benefit guarantors or co-obligors.
Brazil Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Brazil's Superior Court of Justice (STJ) Forth Panel recently upheld that the approval of a financial restructuring plan does not benefit guarantors or co-obligors. Creditors may collect in full from third parties that insured the obligation or from co-obligors.

Pursuant to the judicial restructuring procedure in Brazil, the company undergoing judicial restructuring can renegotiate its debt with creditors by way of a financial restructuring plan. Typically, such plans provide for extension of debt terms and/or partial debt forgiveness. As provided for under the Brazilian Bankruptcy and Reorganization Law (Law n. 11.101, 9 February 2005), once the plan is approved by a certain group of representative creditors it binds all creditors, including those not having agreed with the plan.

From this process, however, a question arises: if the company that is undergoing judicial restructuring is not the sole debtor should the other debtors benefit from the enforcement of the financial restructuring plan?

The query has its origins from interpretation of the language of the Law n. 11.101/05 itself under which approval of the financial restructuring plan results in a "novation".

As defined by the Brazilian Civil Code, novation has the effect of extinguishing the original obligation and thus guarantors and co-obligors are released. This conflicts with the very purpose of Law n. 11.101/05 (as was announced at the time of its enactment, it was drafted with the intention of more efficient credit recuperation towards lowering interest rates).

The STJ answered this doubt deciding that novation in the case of judicial restructuring is to be considered sui generis novation having effects separate and distinct from novation as stated under the Brazilian Civil Code.

Thus, the approval of a financial restructuring plan has the effect of novating the obligations to the restructuring company without impairing or releasing the obligations of guarantors or co-obligors, which continue to be liable for the original debt.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More