ARTICLE
18 December 2008

Arbitration Involving Company Under Winding-Up Proceedings

TA
TozziniFreire Advogados

Contributor

TozziniFreire Advogados logo
A leading full-service law firm in Latin America, TozziniFreire provides safe and innovative legal advice in 47 areas of corporate law. With offices in Brazil and NY, the firm features a unique structure based on industry groups and foreign desks with professionals recognized by the market and key legal guides.
The Brazilian Superior Court of Justice ("STJ") rendered an important decision in the area of arbitration involving a health plan operator company which is under administrative winding-up proceedings.
Brazil Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Brazilian Superior Court of Justice ("STJ") rendered an important decision in the area of arbitration involving a health plan operator company which is under administrative winding-up proceedings (a measure applicable to troubled companies in certain regulated industries).

The company argued that, by virtue of the winding-up proceedings, it was prevented from closing any business dealings or disposing of any assets and, therefore, could not be a party to an arbitration case instituted by another company.

In its decision, the STJ emphasized that the participation of the company in the arbitration did not represent a risk to any public interest related to the winding-up proceedings, especially because the rights of the liquidated estate (and consequently the interests of creditors and third parties in general) could be adequately protected during the arbitration.

In addition, the STJ confirmed that, by applying the Kompetenz-Kompetenz principle, the arbitrators have the authority to decide whether the dispute could be validly submitted to arbitration.

In general terms, the STJ ruling is an important precedent for the validity of arbitration involving a company under administrative winding-up proceedings whenever the public interest is not affected by the arbitration.

Preliminary Injunction n. 14295 – SP (2008/0122928-4-2), STJ

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More