Current development issues in heritage conservation and character protection in Queensland

This paper raises a number of contemporary issues relating to the development of cultural heritage sites in Queensland.
Australia Real Estate and Construction
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In a paper presented at the Queensland Environmental Law Association (QELA) Conference recently, David Nicholls and Olivia Williamson raised concerns about:

  • The new concurrence trigger for development on sites adjoining State heritage places which has been announced under the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 without consideration of the implications for the Queensland Heritage Act, or any amendment of that Act. The trigger and associated amendments to State Development Assessment Provisions potentially has significant implications for development yield on sites adjoining State heritage places.
  • The distinct and divergent treatment of local heritage listing under the Queensland Heritage Act 1992 which has the potential to lead to unsatisfactory local heritage listings without any legal recourse by effected property owners.
  • The trend in cases and in proposed amendments to City Plan 2014, to move away from the protection of the character of streets and neighbourhoods to spot selection of individual houses or small groups of houses for character protection.
  • The decisions of the Courts in two cases in which HopgoodGanim Lawyers successfully acted, University of Queensland v Brisbane City Council and Cbus (2016) QPELR 654 (representing Cbus) concerning 443 Queen Street adjoining the Customs House and Corporation of the Sisters of Mercy of the Diocese of Townsville v Queensland Heritage Council (2017) QPEC 14 (representing the Queensland Heritage Council).

The paper Heritage Conservation, Character Protection and 'The Vibe' can be read by following the link below.

© HopgoodGanim Lawyers

Award-winning law firm HopgoodGanim offers commercially-focused advice, coupled with reliable and responsive service, to clients throughout Australia and across international borders.

2015 AFR Beaton Client Choice Awards:
Best Law Firm (revenue $50m - $200m)
Best Professional Services Firm (revenue $50m - $200m)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Current development issues in heritage conservation and character protection in Queensland

Australia Real Estate and Construction

Contributor

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More