ARTICLE
10 January 2019

Valuer and Retail Leases Update – Failure by landlord to repair air-conditioning deemed to be a breach of the lease

M
Madgwicks

Contributor

Madgwicks Lawyers has been serving clients since 1975 with reliable legal advice, clear explanations of outcomes, and practical options. Their deep expertise helps clients navigate complex matters by providing informed decision-making. The firm prioritizes developing long-term relationships with clients locally and globally, adding value beyond legal services. With over 100 staff and expertise in key practice areas, Madgwicks is an award-winning commercial firm. As part of Meritas, they are connected to a global alliance, offering business law services in 92 countries.
If the lease provides that the premises are air-conditioned, the landlord has an obligation to provide air-conditioning.
Australia Real Estate and Construction
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

If a lease provides that the premises are air-conditioned, then the landlord has an obligation to provide air-conditioning to the tenant.

In brief

Following on from my update in November last year where a tenant was entitled to terminate the lease based on the landlord's failure to repair the air-conditioning, the VCAT decision of Meadsview Pty Ltd v Fenton (Building and Property) [2018] VCAT 124 deemed failure by the landlord to have operative air-conditioning entitled the tenant to compensation.

What you need to know

If a lease provides that the premises are air-conditioned, then the landlord has an obligation to provide air-conditioning to a tenant. As a valuer, you would be entitled to assume that the premises are air-conditioned as a tenant has a right to take action against the landlord if air-conditioning fails. In other words, the rent under a determination should not be reduced because air-conditioning is intermittent or failing.

Background

In this matter, the premises were air-conditioned but the landlord had a dispute with the Owners' Corporation as to where an air-conditioning compressor was to be placed. The lease provided that air-conditioning was included as part of the landlord's fixtures under the lease. The landlord did not dispute that the landlord was to provide air-conditioned premises. As the premises were not air-conditioned, the tenant agreed that the rent would be reduced by $40 per week. The tenant then claimed compensation for the absence of air-conditioning. VCAT accepted that the tenant was entitled to compensation but had already accepted the $40 per week reduction and therefore could not claim further compensation.

Conclusion

If the landlord's fixtures include air-conditioning, then VCAT is likely to determine that the premises should be air-conditioned (in the absence of a clause specifically providing that the premises should have working air-conditioning). A tenant will be entitled to compensation from the landlord if the air-conditioning is not working. As a manager, it is important that the air-conditioning is operative. As a tenant, it is important not to agree to a reduction in rent without seeking legal advice on the potential damages payable.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. Madgwicks is a member of Meritas, one of the world's largest law firm alliances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More