ARTICLE
26 March 2013

Reasonable amounts for food and drink expenses – some common sense prevails

MA
Moore Australia

Contributor

Moore Australia logo
Moore Australia part of a global network of offices, providing auditing and financial reporting services, advising local, national and international clients in the public and private sectors. Moore Australia generates annual revenues in the region of $80m. Moore Australia is part of the Moore Global network and has 14 offices with over 450 people nationwide. Moore Australia has extensive experience in state and local government, biotechnology, energy mining and renewables, health and aged care, education, manufacturing, not for profit, property and construction, retail and tourism and hospitality and has a strong presence in the following service lines: Asia Desk, Audit & Assurance, Business Advisory, Taxation, Corporate Finance, Governance and Risk Advisory.
The ATO has reverted to a single set of rates for reasonable food and drink expenses by an employee receiving a LAFHA.
Australia Tax
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Some common sense appears to have prevailed somewhat with the release of Taxation Determination TD 2013/4.

Moore Stephens amongst others made submissions highlighting the fundamental flaws associated with the salary-band model first proposed in draft Taxation Determination TD 2012/D8 in respect of the reasonable food component.

The Australian Taxation Office ('ATO') has reverted to a single set of rates for reasonable food and drink expenses incurred by an employee receiving a Living Away From Home Allowance ('LAFHA') under a domestic transfer for the 2013/14 fringe benefits tax ('FBT') year.

These new rates are effective 1 April 2013:

'Adults' for this purpose are persons who had attained the age of 12 years before the beginning of the FBT year.

In relation to larger family groupings, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) accepts a food component based on the above figures plus $117 for each additional adult and $59 for each additional child.

Importantly, if food and drink expenses incurred by the employee do not exceed the reasonable amounts substantiation of these expenses are not required.

However, it is not all good news. The net food amounts for the 2013/14 FBT year are lower than those that applied in respect of 2012/13 FBT year for the vast majority of employees.

This means that a significant number of employees who still qualify for a LAFHA may still be facing a pay reduction as at 1 April 2013.

The new rates will apply unless the individual is caught by the transitional measure (see below).

By way of comparison, TD 2012/5 which detailed the reasonable food component for the 2012/13 FBT year commencing 1 April 2012 provided the following:

Overseas employees

The ATO has however instituted separate rates for employees who are living away from home at overseas locations. The applicable rates will be dependent on the location and the size of the accompanying family group.

For further details on the calculation of the reasonable food and drink expenses with respect to overseas employees please refer to the Determination, which can be found by clicking here.

Transitional measure

As a transitional measure for the FBT year commencing on 1 April 2013, where an employee and employer have an existing employment agreement in force as at 27 February 2013 that specifies a rate in Taxation Determination TD 2012/5 and that employment agreement is not varied in a material way or renewed, the rates in TD 2012/5 will continue to be accepted by the Commissioner as reasonable amounts for food and drink expenses incurred by an employee receiving a LAFHA fringe benefit for the 2013/14 FBT year.

These transitional rules are separate from that apply in respect of LAFHA eligibility.

Comments

Whilst the removal of the salary-band system in the final Determination is certainly welcomed, the establishment of separate rates for employees in overseas locations and the transitional measures will add further confusion in navigating through the LAFHA legislation as well as increasing the already burgeoning administrative burden in the year ahead, perhaps to the point where it becomes all too hard for the employers.

This publication is issued by Moore Stephens Australia Pty Limited ACN 062 181 846 (Moore Stephens Australia) exclusively for the general information of clients and staff of Moore Stephens Australia and the clients and staff of all affiliated independent accounting firms (and their related service entities) licensed to operate under the name Moore Stephens within Australia (Australian Member). The material contained in this publication is in the nature of general comment and information only and is not advice. The material should not be relied upon. Moore Stephens Australia, any Australian Member, any related entity of those persons, or any of their officers employees or representatives, will not be liable for any loss or damage arising out of or in connection with the material contained in this publication. Copyright © 2011 Moore Stephens Australia Pty Limited. All rights reserved.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More