ARTICLE
18 March 2012

Insolvent Trading...? Don't go there.

S
Swaab

Contributor

Swaab, established in 1981 in Sydney, Australia, is a law firm that focuses on solving problems and maximizing opportunities for various clients, including entrepreneurs, family businesses, corporations, and high-net-worth individuals. The firm's core values include commitment, integrity, excellence, generosity of spirit, unity, and innovation. Swaab's lawyers have diverse expertise and prioritize building long-term client relationships based on service and empathy.
ASIC has launched legal action against the directors of Kleenmaid for alleged insolvent trading and fraud.
Australia Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

DIRECTOR'S DUTY TO AVOID INSOLVENT TRADING

Section 588G of the Corporations Act 2001 imposes liability on a company director:

  1. who allows a company to incur a debt when the company is insolvent, or becomes insolvent by incurring the debt; and
  2. who suspected at the time when the company incurred the debt that the company was insolvent or would become insolvent as a result of incurring that debt; and
  3. whose failure to prevent the company from incurring the debt was due to dishonesty.

The duty to prevent a company from insolvent trading not only applies to persons who are formally or validly appointed as director but also to persons who act in the position of director, or in accordance with whose instructions or wishes the company's directors are accustomed to act.

To meet the obligation to prevent insolvent trading, directors must, amongst other things:

  1. keep themselves informed about the company's financial affairs and frequently assess the company's solvency and cash flow;
  2. investigate financial difficulties immediately if concerns about the company's financial viability are raised;
  3. seek appropriate professional advice to help address the company's financial difficulties if such difficulties arise; and
  4. consider and act appropriately on advice received, in a timely manner.

KLEENMAID – A CASE STUDY

On February 12 of this year, almost three years after whitegoods king Kleenmaid was placed in voluntary administration, ASIC has launched legal action against the company's directors for alleged insolvent trading and fraud.

The directors were charged with 18 counts of criminal insolvent trading of debts totalling more than $4 million together with $13 million of fraud committed against Westpac Bank. Two directors have also been charged with withdrawing $330,000 from the company's bank accounts two days before it went into voluntary administration.

Insolvent trading attracts a maximum penalty of five years' jail and/or $200,000 fine. Whilst fraud carries a maximum penalty of 12 years' jail.

ASIC's investigation focused on the solvency of the company around March 2008, since it alleges the company continued to trade despite becoming insolvent around this time.

The company was placed into voluntary administration in 2009 after it collapsed with approximately $100 million of debt owing to creditors, including former employees, customers, suppliers and banks.

The matter returns to Court on 17 May 2012.

For further information please contact:

Amber Burgess
Phone: +61 2 9777 8341
Email: ajb@swaab.com.au

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More