ARTICLE
13 December 2017

Drone Damage: What Happens If A Drone Hits You?

CC
Clyde & Co

Contributor

Clyde & Co  logo
Clyde & Co is a leading, sector-focused global law firm with 415 partners, 2200 legal professionals and 3800 staff in over 50 offices and associated offices on six continents. The firm specialises in the sectors that move, build and power our connected world and the insurance that underpins it, namely: transport, infrastructure, energy, trade & commodities and insurance. With a strong focus on developed and emerging markets, the firm is one of the fastest growing law firms in the world with ambitious plans for further growth.
The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) is currently undertaking a review of the regulation of remotely piloted aircraft (otherwise known as drones).
Australia Transport
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) is currently undertaking a review of the regulation of remotely piloted aircraft (otherwise known as drones). It is considering (amongst other things), whether mandatory registration, education and training for operators should be introduced.

There are yet to be any reported decisions of any civil or criminal actions in Australia being taken against drone operators who have caused injury or damage through their use of drones. However, CASA is actively pursuing operators who breach drone safety legislation.

A widely reported incident involved a drone that crashed into a triathlete during the Geraldton Endure Batavia Triathlon in Western Australia in April 2014. The triathlete was reported to have been struck in the head by a drone that had fallen from the sky whilst filming the race and sustained lacerations to the head.1 The matter was referred by CASA to the Commonwealth Department of Public Prosecutions but the Department chose not to prosecute on the basis that the crash was caused by radio interference rather than any action by the operator.2 It has not been reported that the injured athlete has commenced any civil claim against the operator.

Earlier this year, a done operator was fined AUD 900 for flying too low to a Canberra Easter egg hunt. Similarly, the operator of a drone flying at and in the vicinity of wedding guests in regional New South Wales was fined AUD 900. An operator was also fined AUD 1,440 for flying a drone in restricted airspace in Sydney Harbour and within 30 metres of members of the public.3

Given the increasing sophistication of these aircraft, the veritable explosion in their usage, their capacity to carry payloads and their ability to travel vast distances, the potential for injury or damage resulting from drone operations is ever increasing. Add to that the fact that usage in restricted airspace could attract criminal as well as civil liability and CASA's response to these growing issues will need to be comprehensive. CASA's report is due to be released at the end of 2017.

Footnotes

1 http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/river-of-blood-after-drone-hits–Australian-athlete-20140407-zqruh.html

2 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-11-13/drone-operator-at-geraldton-marathan-fined/5887196

3 http://www.casa.gov.au/media-release/easter-egg-hunt-wedding-trigger-drone-fines

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More