ARTICLE
5 February 2015

Changes In Polish Competition Law

VB
Van Bael & Bellis

Contributor

Van Bael & Bellis is a leading independent law firm based in Brussels, with a second office in Geneva dedicated to WTO matters. The firm is well known for its deep expertise in EU competition law, international trade law, EU regulatory law, as well as corporate and commercial law. With nearly 70 lawyers coming from 20 different countries, Van Bael & Bellis offers clients the support of a highly effective team of professionals with multi-jurisdictional expertise and an international perspective.
On 18 January 2015, a major reform of Polish competition law entered into force.
Poland Antitrust/Competition Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On 18 January 2015, a major reform of Polish competition law entered into force. The changes concern, inter alia, (i) limitation periods for sanctioning competition law infringements; (ii) merger notification rules; (iii) leniency procedure; (iv) settlements; and (v) personal liability of individuals for anti-competitive practices.

In relation to the limitation period for sanctioning competition law infringements, the limitation period of one year has been extended to five years from the end of the year in which the infringement ceased.

In relation to the merger notification rules, the changes introduce a two-phase merger control procedure. Mergers that do not raise any serious competition law concerns will be reviewed in phase one. The time of review during phase one is one month from the filing of the notification. More complicated mergers will be reviewed in phase two, during which the Polish Competition Authority ("UOKiK") will have another four months to review the proposed transaction. The new regime preserves the "stop the clock" rule, according to which the above time limits do not run in case of requests for information, clarification, or payment by the UOKiK.

In relation to the leniency procedure, a company filing for leniency no longer has to show that it was not the initiator of the anti-competitive agreement. However, the new rules require that a leniency applicant does have to show that it did not "urge" others to participate in the anti-competitive practice. In addition, the new rules introduce a "leniency plus" concept. According to this concept, an applicant that has filed for leniency in relation to one cartel can be granted an additional reduction of 30% from the fine imposed for the cartel if it files, as a first applicant, another leniency application in relation to another cartel.

Moreover, the changes introduce a settlement procedure whereby companies agreeing to settle their case can benefit from a fine reduction of 10%. To benefit from the settlement procedure, the companies concerned must: (i) voluntarily admit liability for the anti-competitive practices investigated by the UOKiK; (ii) not challenge the amount of the fine; and (iii) not appeal the findings of the UOKiK. The settlement discussion must be initiated before the completion of the infringement proceeding by the UOKiK acting upon its own initiative or upon a request by one of the parties.

Finally, personal liability for anti-competitive practices has been introduced. In particular, individuals performing managerial functions who intentionally allow for the competition law violation can be fined up to PLN 2 million (approximately € 468,000). The fine is administrative in nature and can be imposed only if the company itself has been found liable for a competition law violation. The individuals concerned are also entitled to file a leniency application according to the general leniency rules.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
5 February 2015

Changes In Polish Competition Law

Poland Antitrust/Competition Law

Contributor

Van Bael & Bellis is a leading independent law firm based in Brussels, with a second office in Geneva dedicated to WTO matters. The firm is well known for its deep expertise in EU competition law, international trade law, EU regulatory law, as well as corporate and commercial law. With nearly 70 lawyers coming from 20 different countries, Van Bael & Bellis offers clients the support of a highly effective team of professionals with multi-jurisdictional expertise and an international perspective.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More