ARTICLE
27 January 2022

The Czech Office Imposed A Record Fine Of EUR 4 Million For Vertical Resale Price Agreements

BB
Bird & Bird
Contributor
Bird & Bird is an international law firm which supports organisations being changed by technology and the digital world. We combine exceptional legal expertise, deep industry knowledge and refreshingly creative thinking, to help clients achieve their commercial goals. 1300+ lawyers in 29 offices: Europe, USA, Middle East and Asia Pacific.
The Office for the Protection of Competition ("Office") imposed a fine of CZK 97 million (approx. EUR 4 million) on the company GARLAND distributor, s.r.o. ("GARLAND")...
Czech Republic Antitrust/Competition Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Office for the Protection of Competition ("Office") imposed a fine of CZK 97 million (approx. EUR 4 million) on the company GARLAND distributor, s.r.o. ("GARLAND") for vertical agreements on resale price maintenance. Historically, this is the highest fine ever imposed for this type of anti-competitive conduct, which is the consequence of the new fining guidelines of the Office.

According to the decision, the company GARLAND concluded and fulfilled prohibited resale price maintenance agreements with its customers (distributors) in the period from at least 18 June 2013 to 6 June 2019, i.e. for almost 6 years. The aim of these agreements was to eliminate competition among GARLAND's distributors in the market for garden machinery, equipment and tools for hobby use in the Czech Republic.

The company GARLAND deliberately suppressed competition at the horizontal level among the retailers of the goods it supplied. Retailers could not offer these goods to end consumers at prices lower than those set by the company GARLAND. The conclusion of price agreements was initiated by the company GARLAND, which also insisted on compliance with them and enforced them under threat of sanctions (for example, blocking the customer's account in the ordering system).

The enforcement of price agreements by the company GARLAND also led to customers themselves checking the possible non-compliance of other customers (their competitors) with the set retail prices and requesting GARLAND to provide remedies, i.e. to ensure unified higher retail prices.

This led to the elimination of price competition among retailers and maintaining a higher price level for the goods distributed to them. This first-instance decision is not final and may be appealed.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
27 January 2022

The Czech Office Imposed A Record Fine Of EUR 4 Million For Vertical Resale Price Agreements

Czech Republic Antitrust/Competition Law
Contributor
Bird & Bird is an international law firm which supports organisations being changed by technology and the digital world. We combine exceptional legal expertise, deep industry knowledge and refreshingly creative thinking, to help clients achieve their commercial goals. 1300+ lawyers in 29 offices: Europe, USA, Middle East and Asia Pacific.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More