$520,000 Jury Verdict Against Redbubble For Willful Contributory Infringement

FK
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz

Contributor

Frankfurt Kurnit provides high quality legal services to clients in many industries and disciplines worldwide. With leading practices in entertainment, advertising, IP, technology, litigation, corporate, estate planning, charitable organizations, professional responsibility and other areas — Frankfurt Kurnit helps clients face challenging legal issues and meet their goals with efficient solutions.
$520,000. That's the damage award assessed by a California jury against print-on-demand marketplace Redbubble for willful contributory trademark infringement.
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

$520,000.  That's the damage award assessed by a California jury against print-on-demand marketplace Redbubble for willful contributory trademark infringement. 

According to the plaintiff, fashion brand Y.Y.G.M. SA d/b/a Brandy Melville, Redbubble allows its users to design and sell products, including products bearing Brandy Melville's and others' trademarks.  When the products are purchased,  Redbubble manufactures and ships them.  It also collects payment for them and splits the payment with the user who designed them.  In May 2018, Brandy Melville told Redbubble that it was offering a "massive" number of products bearing or mentioning its trademarks-in particular goods the Brandy Melville heart mark, its LA lightning mark, and other marks-and demanded that it remove the listings.  When Redbubble failed to take the listings down, Brandy Melville sued for trademark infringement, as well as contributory trademark infringement. 

Contributory trademark infringement occurs when the defendant "intentionally induces" the infringer to commit trademark infringement or continues to supply products to persons it knows are engaging in trademark infringement.  Here, Brandy Melville alleged that its 2018 letter put Redbubble on notice that its trademarks were being counterfeited and that, when Redbubble maintained the listings and continued to manufacture, ship, and profit from sales of counterfeit goods, it committed contributory trademark counterfeiting.  The jury agreed, awarding Brandy Melville $300,000 for infringement of the heart mark, $200,000 for infringement of the lightning mark, and $20,000 for infringement of the other marks. 

This decision likely has implications for other cases against Redbubble, including several in the California district courts and one pending in the Sixth Circuit, where that court noted that Redbubble "brings trademark-offending products into being," making it "more than just a passive facilitator" and more vulnerable to claims that it contributes to any infringement occurring on its platform.

www.fkks.com

This alert provides general coverage of its subject area. We provide it with the understanding that Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz is not engaged herein in rendering legal advice, and shall not be liable for any damages resulting from any error, inaccuracy, or omission. Our attorneys practice law only in jurisdictions in which they are properly authorized to do so. We do not seek to represent clients in other jurisdictions.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More