ARTICLE
3 October 2022

Exculpatory Clauses: Can They Protect You?

Much like waivers and releases, Indiana courts have long recognized the validity of exculpatory contracts in which parties agree in advance that one is under no obligation of care for the benefit of the other ...
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Much like waivers and releases, Indiana courts have long recognized the validity of exculpatory contracts in which parties agree in advance that one is under no obligation of care for the benefit of the other and shall not be liable for the consequences of conduct which would otherwise be negligent. Shumate v. Lycan, 675 N.E.2d 749, 752 (Ind. Ct. App. 1997) (citing LaFrenz v. Lake City Fair Bd., 360 N.E.2d 604, 607 (Ind. Ct. App. 1977)). It is well-settled in Indiana that exculpatory contracts are not against public policy. United State Auto Club (USAC) v. Smith, 717 N.E.2d 919 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999). Generally, parties are permitted to agree that a party owes no obligation of care for the benefit of another, and thus, shall not be liable for consequences that would otherwise be considered negligent. Wabash County YMCA v. Thompson, 975 N.E.2d 362 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012) (citing Marsh v. Dixon, 707 N.E.2d 998, 1000 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999)).

However, Indiana courts have held that an exculpatory clause, a clause within a contract, will not act to absolve a party from liability unless it "specifically and explicitly refer[s] to the negligence of the party seeking release from liability." Marsh, 707 N.E.2d at 1000 (quoting Powell v. Am. Health Fitness Ctr. of Fort Wayne, Inc., 694 N.E.2d 757, 761 (Ind. Ct. App. 1998)).

An exculpatory clause may be found sufficiently specific and explicit on the issue of negligence even in the absence of the word itself. Anderson v. Four Seasons Equestrian Ctr., Inc., 852 N.E.2d 576, 581 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006); c q, 975 N.E.2d 362 (Ind. Ct. App. 2021). Furthermore, an exculpatory clause not referring to the negligence of the releasee may act to bar liability for those damages incurred which are inherent in the nature of the activity. Anderson, 852 N.E.2d at 581. The requirement of specificity is necessary only when the risk of harm is the defendant's own negligence. Anderson, 852 N.E.2d at 581-582.

It is important to understand if an exculpatory contract, exculpatory clause, or an indemnity agreement will provide the necessary protection.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
3 October 2022

Exculpatory Clauses: Can They Protect You?

United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Contributor
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More