ARTICLE
30 December 2014

You Better Watch Out, You Better Comply: Regulators Coming To Town (For First-Party Debt Collectors?)

MF
Morrison & Foerster LLP

Contributor

Known for providing cutting-edge legal advice on matters that are redefining industries, Morrison & Foerster has 17 offices located in the United States, Asia, and Europe. Our clients include Fortune 100 companies, leading tech and life sciences companies, and some of the largest financial institutions. We also represent investment funds and startups.
New Yorkers filed over 20,000 complaints concerning debt collectors this year, according to New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, who earlier this month announced new measures to crack down on abusive and deceptive debt collection practices.
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

New Yorkers filed over 20,000 complaints concerning debt collectors this year, according to New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, who earlier this month announced new measures to crack down on abusive and deceptive debt collection practices.  The substance of these complaints ranged from harassment over the phone, to attempts to collect an incorrect amount of money, to contacting the wrong debtor entirely.  In response, the New York Department of Financial Services (DFS) is the latest regulator to issue tougher regulations imposing new obligations on third-party debt collectors.

The New York regulations (like the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA)) apply to third-party collectors—for now.  A DFS spokesperson noted that the DFS "decided to concentrate our first steps on third-party debt collectors, where the majority of the abuses have taken place."  But American Banker reported last week the reach of many efforts to regulate debt collection may soon broaden to include "first-party" collectors—that is, creditors collecting their own debts.  The CFPB has already begun to use Dodd-Frank UDAAP enforcement authority to indirectly apply FDCPA requirements to first-party collectors.  For instance, last month the CFPB entered into a consent order with DriveTime Automotive Group, an auto dealer and lender that collected debts in-house.  The CFPB found that DriveTime made overly aggressive debt collection calls and provided inaccurate data to credit reporting agencies, and that these actions—which the FDCPA prohibits among third-party collectors—amounted to unfair practices under the CFPA.  The CFPB is set to release its proposed rules for debt collection in April 2015, and it would not be surprising if the proposed measures drop—at least in part—the old distinction between third-party collection and the collection of debts in-house.

Read more at American Banker (subscribers only).

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
30 December 2014

You Better Watch Out, You Better Comply: Regulators Coming To Town (For First-Party Debt Collectors?)

United States Finance and Banking

Contributor

Known for providing cutting-edge legal advice on matters that are redefining industries, Morrison & Foerster has 17 offices located in the United States, Asia, and Europe. Our clients include Fortune 100 companies, leading tech and life sciences companies, and some of the largest financial institutions. We also represent investment funds and startups.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More