ARTICLE
3 October 2023

Employment Law Update: NLRB Attack #3 – Employee Handbooks

WG
Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer
Contributor
Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A. is one of the largest and most successful law firms in New Jersey. Our lawyers represent clients in a wide variety of practice areas. Wilentz lawyers are focused on providing our firm's clients with proactive, practical legal solutions that respond to their most significant opportunities and legal challenge
On August 2, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), issued its decision in the Stericycle case.
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On August 2, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), issued its decision in the Stericycle case. The decision created a new standard regarding the lawfulness of workplace rules and policies.

The new standard is as follows:

If an employee could reasonably interpret the work rule/policy to have a reasonable tendency to chill employees from exercising their rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA Rights), the rule/policy is unlawful. The employer's intent in maintaining a work rule is immaterial. The NLRB clarified that it will interpret the rule from the perspective of an employee who is subject to the policy, economically dependent on the employer and contemplates engaging in protected concerted activity (Section 7 rights under the NLRA).1 If the rule can reasonably be interpreted to chill Section 7 rights, the rule is presumptively unlawful.

However, the employer may counter the presumption by proving that the rule/policy advances a legitimate and substantial business interest and that the employer cannot advance that interest with a more narrowly tailored rule/policy. If the employer proves the aforementioned, the work rule/policy will be found lawful.

Each challenged rule/policy will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.

The decision may be appealed. The appeal can take many months or even years. In the meantime, the NLRB will be enforcing this new standard. The risk is, if employees are terminated for violating the unlawful rule, the employer could owe back pay and other penalties.

Takeaway: Employers should review their handbooks/work rules/policies, including but not limited to, rules/provisions regarding:

  • Employees' use of social media.
  • Restricting criticism, negative comments, and disparagement of the company's management, products, or services.
  • Insubordination.
  • Confidentiality of investigations and complaints.
  • Using cameras or recording devices in the workplace.
  • The making of safety complaints.
  • The use of company electronic devices.
  • Comments to the media, government agencies or other third parties.
  • Any other policies that appear to limit an employee's NLRA Section 7 rights.

Employers with questions can contactTracy Armstrongor another member of the WilentzEmployment LawTeam.

Footote

1 Concerted activity includes but is not limited to talking with one or more co-workers about wages and benefits or other working conditions, circulating a petition asking for better hours, participating in a concerted refusal to work in unsafe conditions, and/or talking with other employees to third parties regarding problems/issues in the workplace.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
3 October 2023

Employment Law Update: NLRB Attack #3 – Employee Handbooks

United States Employment and HR
Contributor
Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A. is one of the largest and most successful law firms in New Jersey. Our lawyers represent clients in a wide variety of practice areas. Wilentz lawyers are focused on providing our firm's clients with proactive, practical legal solutions that respond to their most significant opportunities and legal challenge
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More