PRESS RELEASE
18 April 2024

Roberts, Anhang And Marsh Prepare Amicus Brief To The US Supreme Court For WLF Related To The Scope Of Risk Disclosures Under Item 105

SS
Shearman & Sterling LLP
Contributor
Our success is built on our clients’ success. We have a long and distinguished history of supporting our clients wherever they do business, from major financial centers to emerging and growth markets. We represent many of the world’s leading corporations and major financial institutions, as well as emerging growth companies, governments and state-owned enterprises, often working on ground-breaking, precedent-setting matters. With a deep understanding of our clients' businesses and the industries they operate in, our work is driven by their need for outstanding legal and commercial advice.
Partner Lyle Roberts (Washington, D.C.-Litigation), counsel George Anhang (Washington, D.C.-Litigation), and associate Billy Marsh (Dallas-Litigation), filed an amicus brief on behalf of the
United States
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Partner Lyle Roberts (Washington, D.C.-Litigation), counsel George Anhang (Washington, D.C.-Litigation), and associate Billy Marsh (Dallas-Litigation), filed an amicus brief on behalf of the Washington Legal Foundation (WLF) urging the Supreme Court to grant review of the Ninth Circuit's recent opinion in Facebook, Inc. v. Amalgamated Bank and decide whether a public company's risk disclosures under Item 105 of Regulation S-K can form the basis of a viable securities fraud class action under Rule 10b-5 if they do not disclose instances in which a risk has materialized in the past.

The WLF brief urges the Supreme Court to review, and ultimately reverse, the Ninth Circuit decision, which held that a public company's risk disclosures could be false or misleading under Rule 10b-5 if they fail to disclose information about past instances in which a risk has materialized, even if that past event presents no known risk of ongoing or future business harm. As explained in the amicus brief, the Ninth Circuit's ruling could force companies to disclose extensive, immaterial information about past incidents to avoid liability, which will confuse investors and impose undue burden on public companies. The amicus brief also explains how the Ninth Circuit's decision could expose companies to frivolous securities litigation based on accurate, forward-looking risk disclosures—an outcome Congress sought to avoid when it passed the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act.

WLF is a nonprofit public-interest law firm and policy center with supporters in the U.S. Founded in 1977, WLF promotes and defends free enterprise, individual rights, limited government and the rule of law.

The Team

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

PRESS RELEASE
18 April 2024

Roberts, Anhang And Marsh Prepare Amicus Brief To The US Supreme Court For WLF Related To The Scope Of Risk Disclosures Under Item 105

United States
Contributor
Our success is built on our clients’ success. We have a long and distinguished history of supporting our clients wherever they do business, from major financial centers to emerging and growth markets. We represent many of the world’s leading corporations and major financial institutions, as well as emerging growth companies, governments and state-owned enterprises, often working on ground-breaking, precedent-setting matters. With a deep understanding of our clients' businesses and the industries they operate in, our work is driven by their need for outstanding legal and commercial advice.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More