LD Munich, 27, December 2023, Order Of Court In First Instance, UPC_CFI_181/2023

BP
Bardehle Pagenberg
Contributor
BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. As one of the largest IP firms in Europe, BARDEHLE PAGENBERG advises in all fields of Intellectual Property, including all procedures before the patent and trademark offices as well as litigation before the courts through all instances.
The protection of confidential information contained in pleadings and annexes can only be requested within a workflow pursuant to Rule 262...
Germany Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

1. Key takeaways

Protection of confidential information (keynotes)

  • 1. The protection of confidential information contained in pleadings and annexes can only be requested within a workflow pursuant to Rule 262 and/or 262A of the Rules of Procedure at the same time as the initial filing or within 14 days.
  • 2. Unlike the standard practice in national proceedings in Germany, these requests must be repeated when further pleadings and annexes are filed.
  • 3. In exceptional cases, limited protection under Rule 262A of the Rules of Procedure may be provided within the CMS workflow under Rule 9 RoP.
  • 4. If the need for protection of the confidential information is undisputed between the parties, no further judicial review of the need for protection is required.
  • 5. The amount of a penalty payment under Rule 354.3 of the Rules of Procedure is limited by the request.

2. Division

Local Division (Section Munich)

3. UPC number

UPC_CFI_181/2023

4. Type of proceedings

Infringement Action

5. Parties

Claimant: KraussMaffei Extrusion GmbH (Laatzen, DE)

Defendant: TROESTER GmbH & Co. KG (Hannover, DE)

6. Patent(s)

EP 3221117 B1

7. Body of legislation / Rules

Art. 76 UPCA; R. 4.1 RoP; R. 262 RoP; R. 262a RoP

To view the full article, click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

LD Munich, 27, December 2023, Order Of Court In First Instance, UPC_CFI_181/2023

Germany Intellectual Property
Contributor
BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. As one of the largest IP firms in Europe, BARDEHLE PAGENBERG advises in all fields of Intellectual Property, including all procedures before the patent and trademark offices as well as litigation before the courts through all instances.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More