A few months ago, the Intellectual Property Institute of Canada (IPIC) filed an application for leave to appeal at the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) in the case of Benjamin Moore & Co. v. Attorney General of Canada ("Benjamin Moore").
As we've previously discussed, a clear definition of patentable subject matter for computer-implemented inventions (software patents) continues to elude both the Canadian Intellectual Property Office and the federal courts. The prolonged uncertainty has prompted IPIC, an intervener in Benjamin Moore at lower levels, to pursue more explicit directions from the SCC.
The SCC's decision for leave to appeal was refused on Thursday.
This is an unfortunate outcome that leaves many open questions. We were hoping the SCC would provide clarity on the test for patentable subject matter. Moreover, this is a missed opportunity for more case law on patentable subject matter in Canada.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.